CO2 dry reforming of CH4 with Sr and Ni co-doped LaCrO3 perovskite catalysts

被引:67
作者
Wei, Tong [1 ]
Jia, Lichao [1 ]
Luo, Jing-Li [2 ]
Chi, Bo [1 ]
Pu, Jian [1 ]
Li, Jian [1 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Ctr Fuel Cell Innovat, Sch Mat Sci & Engn, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Alberta, Dept Chem & Mat Engn, Edmonton, AB T6G 2G6, Canada
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Sr-doped LaCr0.85Ni0.15O3-delta; CH4 dry reforming; Ni exsolution; Interfacial interaction; Coking resistance; OXIDE FUEL-CELL; NI/SIO2; CATALYST; METHANE; CARBON; NICKEL; TEMPERATURE; NANOPARTICLES; PERFORMANCE; ANODE; NONSTOICHIOMETRY;
D O I
10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.144699
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Catalysts La0.8-xSrxCr0.15Ni0.5O3(x = 0, 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3; P-80, P-71, P-62 and P-53) are prepared and reduced (R-80, R-71, R-62 and R-53) in H-2 for CO2-dry reforming of methane (CO2-DRM). P-80, P-71 and P-62 are single-phase perovskite; P-53 contains additional NiO and SrCrO4. Ni particles are exsolved in R-80, R-71 and R-62 with a strong interfacial interaction; whereas those in R-53 are produced by NiO reduction. Increasing Sr concentration increases basicity and oxygen vacancy concentration of the support. R-53 demonstrates the highest conversion of CH4 and CO2 below 650 degrees C, which decreases to the lowest above 650 degrees C due to carbon deposition, while R-62 shows the highest performance with CH4 and CO2 conversions on the level of 90% at 800 degrees C because of the strong exsolved Ni particle/support interfacial interaction and the high basicity and oxygen vacancy concentration of the support. The performance of R-62 increases with the decrease of gas hourly space velocity (GHSV) from 1.2 to 0.3 x 10(4) ml g(-1) h(-1), and remains stable at 750 degrees C and 0.3 x 10(4) ml g(-1) h(-1) with conversions of CH4 and CO2 near 90% and selectivities of H-2 and CO above 95%.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Theoretical study on the effect of Mn promoter for CO2 reforming of CH4 on the Ni(111) surface
    Li, Kai
    Li, Meiqing
    Wang, Ying
    Wu, Zhijian
    FUEL, 2020, 274
  • [42] Modifying alumina with CaO or MgO in supported Ni and Ni-Co catalysts and its effect on dry reforming of CH4
    Sengupta, Siddhartha
    Deo, Goutam
    JOURNAL OF CO2 UTILIZATION, 2015, 10 : 67 - 77
  • [43] Studies on carbon deposition of catalysts for CH4 reforming reaction with CO2
    Liu, SY
    Huang, W
    Yin, LH
    Ding, YH
    Jin, P
    PROSPECTS FOR COAL SCIENCE IN THE 21ST CENTURY, 1999, : 73 - 76
  • [44] Promotional Effect of Ni-Sn Interaction over Ni Supported on Sn-incorporated MCM-41 Catalysts for CO2 Reforming of CH4
    Zhao, Yutong
    Wang, Zichun
    Yang, Wenjie
    Gu, Shengshen
    Yang, Xiaoxia
    Kheradmand, Amanj
    Zhang, Xingmo
    Luo, Yongming
    Huang, Jun
    Jiang, Yijiao
    CHEMNANOMAT, 2021, 7 (08) : 927 - 934
  • [45] CO2 reforming of CH4 by synergies of binode thermal plasma and catalysts
    Xu, Yan
    Wei, Qiang
    Long, Huali
    Zhang, Xiaoqing
    Shang, Shuyong
    Dai, Xiaoyan
    Yin, Yongxiang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2013, 38 (03) : 1384 - 1390
  • [46] Reforming and cracking of CH4 over Al2O3 supported Ni, Ni-Fe and Ni-Co catalysts
    Ray, Koustuv
    Sengupta, Siddhartha
    Deo, Goutam
    FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 156 : 195 - 203
  • [47] Doped Ni Catalysts for Methane Reforming with CO2
    Jinhua Fei
    Zhaoyin Hou
    Xiaoming Zheng
    Tatsuaki Yashima
    Catalysis Letters, 2004, 98 : 241 - 246
  • [48] Hydrogen production by CO2 reforming of CH4 in coke oven gas over Ni-Co/MgAl2O4 catalysts
    Li, Guangshi
    Cheng, Hongwei
    Zhao, Hongbin
    Lu, Xionggang
    Xu, Qian
    Wu, Cheng
    CATALYSIS TODAY, 2018, 318 : 46 - 51
  • [49] Doped Ni catalysts for methane reforming with CO2
    Fei, JH
    Hou, ZY
    Zheng, XM
    Yashima, TS
    CATALYSIS LETTERS, 2004, 98 (04) : 241 - 245
  • [50] Effect of pore structure on Ni catalyst for CO2 reforming of CH4
    Sun, Nannan
    Wen, Xia
    Wang, Feng
    Wei, Wei
    Sun, Yuhan
    ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2010, 3 (03) : 366 - 369