Comparison of Scalarization Functions within a Local Surrogate Assisted Multi-objective Memetic Algorithm Framework for Expensive Problems

被引:0
作者
Palar, Pramudita Satria [1 ]
Tsuchiya, Takeshi [1 ]
Parks, Geoff [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tokyo, Dept Aeronaut & Astronaut, Tokyo 1138656, Japan
[2] Univ Cambridge, Engn Design Ctr, Dept Engn, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, England
来源
2015 IEEE CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION (CEC) | 2015年
关键词
Scalarizing functions; local surrogate model; local search; NSGA-II; expensive problem; OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Combining a surrogate model and a heuristic-based optimizer for multi-objective optimization is now a common approach to make best use of the available computational budget. One possible combination is to use a local surrogate that acts as a guide for local search as a module of the heuristic algorithm. The local search works by optimizing the scalarizing function and uses the local surrogate as a cheap replacement of the original function. Various scalarizing functions exist and an understanding of the advantages and disadvantages of these functions is needed for further improvement of the optimization algorithms. In this paper, various scalarizing functions implemented inside a single surrogate assisted local search memetic algorithm (SS-MOMA) framework are compared. The scalarizing functions studied here are the Tchebycheff type (SS-MOMA-TC) and weighted sum (SS-MOMA-WS) with 15-dimensional ZDT1, ZDT2, and ZDT3 test problems as the benchmark problems using the generational distance and diversity metrics as performance indicators. On the ZDT1, ZDT2, and ZDT3 problems, SS-MOMA-TC clearly outperforms SS-MOMA-WS. The results show that the Tchebycheff scalarizing function can enhance the diversity of the non-dominated solutions independent of the convexity of the problem, but it encounters a slight difficulty with the discontinuous Pareto front of ZDT3.
引用
收藏
页码:862 / 869
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], INTEGRATING CROSS DO
  • [2] A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II
    Deb, K
    Pratap, A
    Agarwal, S
    Meyarivan, T
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2002, 6 (02) : 182 - 197
  • [3] Derbel B, 2014, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V8672, P548
  • [4] ALGORITHM-247 - RADICAL-INVERSE QUASI-RANDOM POINT SEQUENCE [G5]
    HALTON, JH
    SMITH, GB
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 1964, 7 (12) : 701 - 702
  • [5] Jeong S, 2005, IEEE C EVOL COMPUTAT, P2138
  • [6] Comparison of Several Optimization Strategies for Robust Turbine Blade Design
    Keane, Andy J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROPULSION AND POWER, 2009, 25 (05) : 1092 - 1099
  • [7] Knowles J, 2005, STUD FUZZ SOFT COMP, V166, P313
  • [8] HCS: A New Local Search Strategy for Memetic Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms
    Lara, Adriana
    Sanchez, Gustavo
    Coello Coello, Carlos A.
    Schuetze, Oliver
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2010, 14 (01) : 112 - 132
  • [9] Generalizing Surrogate-Assisted Evolutionary Computation
    Lim, Dudy
    Jin, Yaochu
    Ong, Yew-Soon
    Sendhoff, Bernhard
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2010, 14 (03) : 329 - 355
  • [10] Massaro A, 2012, J AIRCRAFT, V49, P375, DOI [10.2514/1.0001017, 10.2514/1.C001017]