Influence of evolution on the stability of ecological communities

被引:55
作者
Loeuille, Nicolas [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris 06, Lab Ecol & Evolut, CNRS, UMR 7625, F-75005 Paris, France
[2] INRA, USC2031, F-75005 Paris, France
关键词
Adaptive dynamics; community stability; directional selection; diversity-stability debate; population dynamics stability; FOOD WEBS; POPULATION-DYNAMICS; PREY; COEVOLUTION; PREDATOR; CONSEQUENCES; ADAPTATION; STRATEGIES; SELECTION; PLANTS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01545.x
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
In randomly assembled communities, diversity is known to have a destabilizing effect. Evolution may affect this result, but our theoretical knowledge of its role is mostly limited to models of small food webs. In the present article, I introduce evolution in a two-species Lotka-Volterra model in which I vary the interaction type and the cost constraining evolution. Regardless of the cost type, evolution tends to stabilize the dynamics more often in trophic interactions than for mutualism or competition. I then use simulations to study the effect of evolution in larger communities that contain all interaction types. Results suggest that evolution usually stabilizes the dynamics. This stabilizing effect is stronger when evolution affects trophic interactions, but happens for all interaction types. Stabilization decreases with diversity and evolution becomes destabilizing in very diverse communities. This suggests that evolution may not counteract the destabilizing effect of diversity observed in random communities.
引用
收藏
页码:1536 / 1545
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Modelling the adaptive dynamics of traits involved in inter- and intraspecific interactions: An assessment of three methods [J].
Abrams, PA .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2001, 4 (02) :166-175
[2]   The nature of predation: prey dependent, ratio dependent or neither? [J].
Abrams, PA ;
Ginzburg, LR .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2000, 15 (08) :337-341
[3]  
Abrams PA, 1997, EVOLUTION, V51, P1742, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb05098.x
[4]   The evolution of predator-prey interactions: Theory and evidence [J].
Abrams, PA .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS, 2000, 31 :79-105
[5]   Network structure, predator-prey modules, and stability in large food webs [J].
Allesina, Stefano ;
Pascual, Mercedes .
THEORETICAL ECOLOGY, 2008, 1 (01) :55-64
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1958, ECOLOGY INVASIONS PL
[7]   Asymmetric coevolutionary networks facilitate biodiversity maintenance [J].
Bascompte, J ;
Jordano, P ;
Olesen, JM .
SCIENCE, 2006, 312 (5772) :431-433
[8]   The nested assembly of plant-animal mutualistic networks [J].
Bascompte, J ;
Jordano, P ;
Melián, CJ ;
Olesen, JM .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2003, 100 (16) :9383-9387
[9]   Foraging biology predicts food web complexity [J].
Beckerman, Andrew P. ;
Petchey, Owen L. ;
Warren, Philip H. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2006, 103 (37) :13745-13749
[10]   Modelling coevolution in multispecies communities [J].
Caldarelli, G ;
Higgs, PG ;
McKane, AJ .
JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 1998, 193 (02) :345-358