Estimating causal effects of public health education campaigns using propensity score methodology

被引:84
作者
Yanovitzky, I
Zanutto, E
Hornik, R
机构
[1] Rutgers State Univ, Dept Commun, Sch Commun Informat & Lib Studies, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2005.01.004
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Many evaluations of public health education campaigns attempt to draw conclusions regarding the effect of messages on audiences' attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors based on observational data. To make causal inferences in these instances, it is necessary to adjust estimated campaign effects for possible selection bias due to systematic differences between respondents exposed to the campaign and those that were not. In particular, it is necessary to adjust for the impact of confounding variables that are likely to be determinants of both campaign exposure and outcomes. In comparison to other available methods for adjusting for selection bias such as multiple regression and instrumental variable methods, propensity scores offer a particularly simple way of adjusting estimates of campaign exposure effects for selection bias. This paper discusses the logic of this approach and illustrates its application to the evaluation of the National Youth Anti-Drug Media Campaign. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 220
页数:12
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
Allison PD., 2001, MISSING DATA
[2]  
Angrist JD, 1996, J AM STAT ASSOC, V91, P444, DOI 10.2307/2291629
[3]  
[Anonymous], EVALUATION NATL YOUT
[4]   EFFECTIVENESS OF ADJUSTMENT BY SUBCLASSIFICATION IN REMOVING BIAS IN OBSERVATIONAL STUDIES [J].
COCHRAN, WG .
BIOMETRICS, 1968, 24 (02) :295-&
[5]   Estimating and using propensity scores with partially missing data [J].
D'Agostino, RB ;
Rubin, DB .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 95 (451) :749-759
[6]  
D'Agostino RB, 1998, STAT MED, V17, P2265, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19981015)17:19<2265::AID-SIM918>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-B
[8]   Causal effects in, nonexperimental studies: Reevaluating the evaluation of training programs [J].
Dehejia, RH ;
Wahba, S .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 94 (448) :1053-1062
[9]   EFFECTS OF MISSPECIFICATION OF THE PROPENSITY SCORE ON ESTIMATORS OF TREATMENT EFFECT [J].
DRAKE, C .
BIOMETRICS, 1993, 49 (04) :1231-1236
[10]  
HECKMAN JJ, 1995, 185 NAT BUR EC RES