Safety evaluation of the food enzyme glucan 1,4-α-glucosidase from the genetically modified Aspergillus niger strain NZYM-BE

被引:1
作者
Lambre, Claude
Baviera, Jose Manuel Barat
Bolognesi, Claudia
Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro
Crebelli, Riccardo
Gott, David Michael
Grob, Konrad
Lampi, Evgenia
Mengelers, Marcel
Mortensen, Alicja
Riviere, Gilles
Steffensen, Inger-Lise
Tlustos, Christina
Van Loveren, Henk
Vernis, Laurence
Zorn, Holger
Glandorf, Boet
Herman, Lieve
Aguilera, Jaime
Andryszkiewicz, Magdalena
Arcella, Davide
Kovalkovicova, Natalia
de Sousa, Rita Ferreira
Liu, Yi
Chesson, Andrew
机构
关键词
food enzyme; glucan 1,4-alpha-glucosidase; 4-alpha-D-glucan glucohydrolase; EC; 3.2.1.3; glucomylase; Aspergillus niger; genetically modified microorganism; ALPHA-AMYLASE; BREAD;
D O I
10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7374
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
The food enzyme glucan 1,4-alpha-glucosidase (4-alpha-D-glucan glucohydrolase EC 3.2.1.3) is produced with the genetically modified Aspergillus niger strain NZYM-BE by Novozymes A/S. The genetic modifications do not give rise to safety concerns. The food enzyme was free from viable cells of the production organism and its DNA. The food enzyme is intended to be used in six food manufacturing processes, namely starch processing for the production of glucose syrups and other starch hydrolysates, distilled alcohol production, brewing processes, baking processes, cereal-based processes, and fruit and vegetable processing for juice production. Since residual amounts of total organic solids (TOS) are removed by distillation and by the purification steps applied to produce glucose syrups, dietary exposure was not calculated for these two food processes. For the remaining four processes, dietary exposure to the food enzyme-TOS was estimated to be up to 7.7 mg TOS/kg body weight (bw) per day in European populations. Genotoxicity tests did not raise a safety concern. The systemic toxicity was assessed by means of a repeated dose 90-day oral toxicity study in rats. The Panel identified a no observed adverse effect level of 3,795 mg TOS/kg bw per day, the highest dose tested, which when compared with the estimated dietary exposure, results in a margin of exposure above 490. Similarity of the amino acid sequence of the food enzyme to those of known allergens was searched for and one match found. The Panel considered that, under the intended conditions of use (other than distilled alcohol production) the risk of allergic sensitisation and elicitation reactions by dietary exposure cannot be excluded, but the likelihood for this to occur is considered to be low. Based on the data provided, the Panel concluded that this food enzyme does not give rise to safety concerns under the intended conditions of use. (C) 2022 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KgaA on behalf of the European Food Safety Authority.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Guidance of the Scientific Panel of Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids (CEF) on the Submission of a Dossier on Food Enzymes for Safety Evaluation by the Scientific Panel of Food Contact Material, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids
    Anadon, Arturo
    Bell, David
    Binderup, Mona-Lise
    Bursch, Wilfried
    Castle, Laurence
    Crebelli, Riccardo
    Engel, Karl-Heinz
    Franz, Roland
    Gontard, Nathalie
    Haertle, Thomas
    Husoy, Trine
    Jany, Klaus-Dieter
    Leclercq, Catherine
    Lhuguenot, Jean-Claude
    Mennes, Wim C.
    Milana, Maria Rosaria
    Pfaff, Karla
    Svensson, Kettil
    Toldra, Fidel
    Waring, Rosemary
    Woelfle, Detlef
    [J]. EFSA JOURNAL, 2009, 7 (08)
  • [2] Scientific Opinion on the assessment of allergenicity of GM plants and microorganisms and derived food and feed EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO Panel)
    Andersson, Hans Christer
    Arpaia, Salvatore
    Bartsch, Detlef
    Casacuberta, Josep
    Davies, Howard
    du Jardin, Patrick
    Flachowsky, Gerhard
    Herman, Lieve
    Jones, Huw
    Karenlampi, Sirpa
    Kiss, Jozsef
    Kleter, Gijs
    Kuiper, Harry
    Messean, Antoine
    Nielsen, Kaare Magne
    Perry, Joe
    Poeting, Annette
    Sweet, Jeremy
    Tebbe, Christoph
    von Wright, Atte Johannes
    Wal, Jean-Michel
    [J]. EFSA JOURNAL, 2010, 8 (07)
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1995, OECD guideline for the testing of chemicals - water solubility. No. 105
  • [4] Why can patients with baker's asthma tolerate wheat flour ingestion? Is wheat pollen allergy relevant?
    Armentia, A.
    Diaz-Perales, A.
    Castrodeza, J.
    Duenas-Laita, A.
    Palacin, A.
    Fernandez, S.
    [J]. ALLERGOLOGIA ET IMMUNOPATHOLOGIA, 2009, 37 (04) : 203 - 204
  • [5] Guidance of the Scientific Committee on a request from EFSA related to Uncertainties in Dietary Exposure Assessment Request No EFSA-Q-2004-019 Adopted on 14 December 2006
    Barlow, Sue
    Chesson, Andrew
    Collins, John
    Dybing, Erik
    Flynn, Albert
    Fruijtier-Polloth, Claudia
    Hardy, Tony
    Knaap, Ada
    Kuiper, Harry
    Le Neindre, Pierre
    Schans, Jan
    Schlatter, Josef
    Silano, Vittorio
    Skerving, Steffan
    Vannier, Philippe
    [J]. EFSA JOURNAL, 2007, 5 (01)
  • [6] ALLERGIC REACTION AFTER EATING ALPHA-AMYLASE (ASP-O-2)-CONTAINING BREAD
    BAUR, X
    CZUPPON, AB
    [J]. ALLERGY, 1995, 50 (01) : 85 - 87
  • [7] Clinical responses to ingested fungal alpha-amylase and hemicellulase in persons sensitized to Aspergillus fumigatus?
    Cullinan, P
    Cook, A
    Jones, M
    Cannon, J
    Fitzgerald, B
    Taylor, AJN
    [J]. ALLERGY, 1997, 52 (03) : 346 - 349
  • [8] EFSA Scientific Committee, 2009, EFSA J, V7, P22, DOI [10.2903/j.efsa.2009.1051, DOI 10.2903/J.EFSA.2009.1051]
  • [10] FAO/WHO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations/World Health Organization), 2006, FAO JECFA Monographs, V3, P63