Soil carbon sequestration in urban afforestation sites in New York City

被引:14
作者
Downey, Alisen E. [1 ]
Groffman, Peter M. [1 ,2 ,3 ,8 ]
Mejia, Gisselle A. [2 ,3 ]
Cook, Elizabeth M. [4 ,5 ]
Sritrairat, Sanpisa [5 ]
Karty, Richard [5 ,6 ]
Palmer, Matthew, I [7 ]
McPhearson, Timon [5 ,8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] CUNY Brooklyn Coll, Dept Earth & Environm Sci, 2900 Bedford Ave, Brooklyn, NY 11210 USA
[2] CUNY, Adv Sci Res Ctr, Grad Ctr, 85 St Nicholas Terrace, New York, NY 10031 USA
[3] CUNY, Dept Earth & Environm Sci, Grad Ctr, 365 5th Ave, New York, NY 10016 USA
[4] Barnard Coll, Dept Environm Sci, 3009 Broadway, New York, NY 10027 USA
[5] New Sch, Urban Syst Lab, 79 5th Ave 16, New York, NY 10003 USA
[6] Bund Umwelt & Nat Schutz Deutschland, Friends Earth Germany, Crellestr 35, D-10827 Berlin, Germany
[7] Columbia Univ, Dept Ecol Evolut & Environm Biol, 1200 Amsterdam Ave,MC 5557, New York, NY 10027 USA
[8] Cary Inst Ecosyst Studies, 2801 Sharon Turnpike, Millbrook, NY 12545 USA
[9] Stockholm Univ, Stockholm Resilience Ctr, Kraftriket 2B, S-10691 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
Carbon storage; Cities; MillionTreesNYC; Urban forest management; Urban forest restoration; ORGANIC-CARBON; CLIMATE-CHANGE; BIODIVERSITY; STOCKS; MODERATE; IMPACTS; STORAGE; REGION; DECADE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127342
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
There is great interest in the ability of afforestation programs to sequester carbon, improve soil health, and provide other ecological benefits to urban areas. However, the capacity of urban soils to support successful afforestation and sequester carbon is poorly understood. This study quantified soil carbon in a series of experimental restoration sites established between 2009 and 2011 as part of the MillionTreesNYC Afforestation Project in New York City. Soil cores (0-100 cm) were collected at 10 sites and analyzed for total carbon content. Data were analyzed with respect to depth (0-10, 10-30, 30-70, 70-90, 90-100 cm), high (six species) versus low (two species) diversity planting palettes, and afforestation success (high or low). Results were compared with data from regional reference forest, degraded urban sites in New York City, and disturbed and undisturbed sites in other cities. High success afforestation sites had significantly larger carbon pools than low success afforestation sites and degraded NYC sites. We suggest that these differences were created by interactions between initial site conditions that facilitated plant community establishment and growth, which in turn increased soil carbon accumulation. These initial site conditions include land use history that influences soil physical and chemical factors, as well as proximity to existing forest stands. Diversity treatments had no effect on soil carbon levels, but these may need a longer time period to emerge. These results suggest that afforestation may enhance the capacity of urban soils to store carbon compared to urban degraded soils, but that urban soil properties and site characteristics constrain this capacity.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Soil organic carbon stock in different urban land uses: high stock evidence in urban parks [J].
Canedoli, Claudia ;
Ferre, Chiara ;
Abu El Khair, Davide ;
Padoa-Schioppa, Emilio ;
Comolli, Roberto .
URBAN ECOSYSTEMS, 2020, 23 (01) :159-171
[2]   Meta-analysis shows positive effects of plant diversity on microbial biomass and respiration [J].
Chen, Chen ;
Chen, Han Y. H. ;
Chen, Xinli ;
Huang, Zhiqun .
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2019, 10 (1)
[3]   Plant diversity enhances productivity and soil carbon storage [J].
Chen, Shiping ;
Wang, Wantong ;
Xu, Wenting ;
Wang, Yang ;
Wan, Hongwei ;
Chen, Dima ;
Tang, Zhiyao ;
Tang, Xuli ;
Zhou, Guoyi ;
Xie, Zongqiang ;
Zhou, Daowei ;
Shangguan, Zhouping ;
Huang, Jianhui ;
He, Jin-Sheng ;
Wang, Yanfen ;
Sheng, Jiandong ;
Tang, Lisong ;
Li, Xinrong ;
Dong, Ming ;
Wu, Yan ;
Wang, Qiufeng ;
Wang, Zhiheng ;
Wu, Jianguo ;
Chapin, F. Stuart, III ;
Bai, Yongfei .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2018, 115 (16) :4027-4032
[4]   Afforestation for climate change mitigation: Potentials, risks and trade-offs [J].
Doelman, Jonathan C. ;
Stehfest, Elke ;
van Vuuren, Detlef P. ;
Tabeau, Andrzej ;
Hof, Andries F. ;
Braakhekke, Maarten C. ;
Gernaat, David E. H. J. ;
van den Berg, Maarten ;
van Zeist, Willem-Jan ;
Daioglou, Vassilis ;
van Meijl, Hans ;
Lucas, Paul L. .
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2020, 26 (03) :1576-1591
[5]   Both tree and soil carbon need to be quantified for carbon assessments of cities [J].
Dorendorf, Jens ;
Eschenbach, Annette ;
Schmidt, Katharina ;
Jensen, Kai .
URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING, 2015, 14 (03) :447-455
[6]   Controls on Soil Organic Carbon Stocks and Turnover Among North American Ecosystems [J].
Frank, Douglas A. ;
Pontes, Alyssa W. ;
McFarlane, Karis J. .
ECOSYSTEMS, 2012, 15 (04) :604-615
[7]   Soil organic carbon distribution in roadside soils of Singapore [J].
Ghosh, Subhadip ;
Scharenbroch, Bryant C. ;
Ow, Lai Fern .
CHEMOSPHERE, 2016, 165 :163-172
[8]  
GROSSMANN WD, 1993, HUMANS AS COMPONENTS OF ECOSYSTEMS, P229
[9]   Urbanization and the carbon cycle: Current capabilities and research outlook from the natural sciences perspective [J].
Hutyra, Lucy R. ;
Duren, Riley ;
Gurney, Kevin R. ;
Grimm, Nancy ;
Kort, Eric A. ;
Larson, Elisabeth ;
Shrestha, Gyami .
EARTHS FUTURE, 2014, 2 (10) :473-495
[10]   Drivers of soil carbon in residential 'pure lawns' in Auburn, Alabama [J].
Huyler, Ann ;
Chappelka, Arthur H. ;
Prior, Stephen A. ;
Somers, Greg L. .
URBAN ECOSYSTEMS, 2014, 17 (01) :205-219