Radiation dose differences between digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis are dependent on breast thickness

被引:3
作者
Alakhras, Maram M. [1 ]
Mello-Thoms, Claudia [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Bourne, Roger [1 ]
Rickard, Mary [1 ,4 ]
Diffey, Jennifer [5 ]
Brennan, Patrick C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, MIOPeG, Fac Hlth Sci, 75 East St, Lidcombe, NSW 2141, Australia
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Dept Biomed Informat, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[4] Sydney Breast Clin, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] John Hunter Hosp, New Lambton, NSW, Australia
来源
MEDICAL IMAGING 2016: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING | 2016年 / 9783卷
关键词
Radiation dose; Dosimeter; Mean glandular dose; Digital mammography; Tomosynthesis; SCREEN-FILM MAMMOGRAPHY; SYSTEM; UK;
D O I
10.1117/12.2216492
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
Purpose To evaluate the radiation dose derived from digital mammography (DM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) at different tube current-exposure time product (mAs) and at 6 phantom thicknesses from 10 to 60 mm. Materials and Methods A total of 240 DM and DBT cranio-caudal (CC) phantom images were acquired at each thickness and at four exposure levels (the baseline mAs, 50%, 25% and 12.5% the baseline mAs). The incident Air Kerma (K) at the surface of the phantoms was measured using a solid state dosimeter. Mean Glandular Doses (MGD) were calculated for both modalities (DM and DBT). Results DBT dose was greater than that of DM for all mAs at each phantom thickness. For a breast thickness of 50 mm (close to average sized breast), the dose for DBT (2.32 mGy) was 13% higher than that for DM (2.05 mGy). The results also show that the difference in MGD between DM and DBT was less for the thicker compared with the thinner phantom, this difference being approximately a factor of 2.58 at 10 mm compared with a factor of 1.08 at 60 mm. While the MGD increased with increasing phantom thickness for both modalities, the dose increase with DBT was less than for DM, with the difference between 10 and 60 mm being a factor of 7 for DM and 3 for DBT. Conclusion The radiation dose from DBT was higher than that of DM and the difference in dose between DM and DBT decreases as phantom thickness increases.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Performance comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography in clinical practice [J].
Berns, EA ;
Hendrick, RE ;
Cutter, GR .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2002, 29 (05) :830-834
[2]  
Dance David R., 2012, Breast Imaging. Proceedings 11th International Workshop, IWDM 2012, P316, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-31271-7_41
[3]   Estimation of mean glandular dose for breast tomosynthesis: factors for use with the UK, European and IAEA breast dosimetry protocols [J].
Dance, D. R. ;
Young, K. C. ;
van Engen, R. E. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2011, 56 (02) :453-471
[4]   Additional factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose using the UK mammography dosimetry protocol [J].
Dance, DR ;
Skinner, CL ;
Young, KC ;
Beckett, JR ;
Kotre, CJ .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2000, 45 (11) :3225-3240
[5]   MONTE-CARLO CALCULATION OF CONVERSION FACTORS FOR THE ESTIMATION OF MEAN GLANDULAR BREAST DOSE [J].
DANCE, DR .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1990, 35 (09) :1211-1219
[6]   Optimal photon energy comparison between digital breast tomosynthesis and mammography: A case study [J].
Di Maria, S. ;
Baptista, M. ;
Felix, M. ;
Oliveira, N. ;
Matela, N. ;
Janeiro, L. ;
Vaz, P. ;
Orvalho, L. ;
Silva, A. .
PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 30 (04) :482-488
[7]   Clinical Digital Breast Tomosynthesis System: Dosimetric Characterization [J].
Feng, Steve Si Jia ;
Sechopoulos, Ioannis .
RADIOLOGY, 2012, 263 (01) :35-42
[8]   Dose comparison between screen/film and full-field digital mammography [J].
Gennaro, Gisella ;
di Maggio, Cosimo .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2006, 16 (11) :2559-2566
[9]  
HAMMERSTEIN GR, 1979, RADIOLOGY, V130, P485
[10]   Mean glandular dose estimation using MCNPX for a digital breast tomosynthesis system with tungsten/aluminum and tungsten/aluminum plus silver x-ray anode-filter combinations [J].
Ma, Andy K. W. ;
Darambara, Dimitra G. ;
Stewart, Alexander ;
Gunn, Spencer ;
Bullard, Edward .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (12) :5278-5289