Species Dependent Influence of (-)-α-Pinene on Attraction of Ambrosia Beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) to Ethanol-Baited Traps in Nursery Agroecosystems

被引:59
作者
Ranger, Christopher M. [1 ,2 ]
Reding, Michael E. [1 ,2 ]
Gandhi, Kamal J. K. [3 ]
Oliver, Jason B. [4 ]
Schultz, Peter B. [5 ]
Canas, Luis [2 ]
Herms, Daniel A. [2 ]
机构
[1] ARS, Hort Insects Res Lab, USDA, Wooster, OH 44691 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Ohio Agr Res & Dev Ctr, Dept Entomol, Wooster, OH 44691 USA
[3] Univ Georgia, Daniel B Warnell Sch Forestry & Nat Resources, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[4] Tennessee State Univ, Otis L Floyd Nursery Res Ctr, Sch Agr & Consumer Sci, Mcminnville, TN 37110 USA
[5] Virginia Tech Univ, Hampton Rd Agr Res & Extens Ctr, Virginia Beach, VA 23455 USA
关键词
ethanol; alpha-pinene; ambrosia beetles; Scolytinae; TRYPODENDRON-LINEATUM COLEOPTERA; ALPHA-PINENE; BARK BEETLES; STRESS; KAIROMONES; VOLATILES; FLIGHT;
D O I
10.1603/EC10243
中图分类号
Q96 [昆虫学];
学科分类号
摘要
Field-based trapping experiments were conducted in Ohio in 2003, 2004, and 2008 to determine the influence of (-)-alpha-pinene on the attraction of exotic and native ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) to ethanol-baited traps. In 2003 and 2004, we determined the effect of adding an (-)-alpha-pinene ultrahigh release lure (UHR; 2 g/d at 20 degrees C) to traps baited with an ethanol UHR lure (0.39 g/d). Fewer Anisandrus (Xyleborus) sayi (Hopkins) and Xyleborinus saxeseni (Ratzeburg) were collected in 2003 and 2004 from traps baited with ethanol UHR plus (-)-alpha-pinene UHR compared with ethanol UHR. (-)-alpha-Pinene also reduced the attraction of Xyloterinus politus (Say) to ethanol-baited traps in 2004. Total captures of Xylosandrus germanus (Blandford) in 2003 were higher in traps baited with ethanol UHR plus (-)-alpha-pinene UHR than in traps with ethanol UHR alone but not in 2004. In 2008, captures were compared among traps baited with eight combinations of ethanol and (-)-alpha-pinene at both UHR and low release (LR) rates. Release rates for ethanol LR and (-)-alpha-pinene LR were 0.027 and 0.0015 g/d, respectively. (-)-alpha-Pinene UHR and (-)-alpha-pinene LR reduced the attractiveness of ethanol UHR to A. sayi and X. saxeseni. Ethanol UHR was also more attractive than ethanol LR to A. sayi and X. germanus. These findings demonstrate traps baited with ethanol alone are more effective than ethanol plus (-)-alpha-pinene for monitoring ambrosia beetle flight activity in ornamental nurseries. Ethanol release rate is also an important consideration for monitoring purposes.
引用
收藏
页码:574 / 579
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], PROC US MAN VERS 6
[2]  
BAKKE A, 1983, COLEOPTERA, V95, pD161
[3]   Effect of water stress on monoterpene emissions from young potted holm oak (Quercus ilex L) trees [J].
Bertin, N ;
Staudt, M .
OECOLOGIA, 1996, 107 (04) :456-462
[4]  
Byers John A., 1995, P154
[5]   Synergistic effect of ethanol to α-pinene in primary attraction of the larger pine shoot beetle, Tomicus piniperda [J].
Czokajlo, D ;
Teale, SA .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ECOLOGY, 1999, 25 (05) :1121-1130
[6]   Species Composition, Seasonal Activity, and Semiochemical Response of Native and Exotic Bark and Ambrosia Beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) in Northeastern Ohio [J].
Gandhi, Kamal J. K. ;
Cognato, Anthony I. ;
Lightle, Danielle M. ;
Mosley, Bryson J. ;
Nielsen, David G. ;
Herms, Daniel A. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY, 2010, 103 (04) :1187-1195
[7]   A review and synthesis of monoterpene speciation from forests in the United States [J].
Geron, C ;
Rasmussen, R ;
Arnts, RR ;
Guenther, A .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2000, 34 (11) :1761-1781
[8]   DIRECT FERMENTATION OF CELLULOSE TO ETHANOL BY A CELLULOLYTIC FILAMENTOUS FUNGUS, MONILIA-SP [J].
GONG, CS ;
MAUN, CM ;
TSAO, GT .
BIOTECHNOLOGY LETTERS, 1981, 3 (02) :77-82
[9]  
Gregoire Jean-Claude, 2003, Integrated Pest Management Reviews, V6, P237, DOI 10.1023/A:1025723402355
[10]   Attraction of Scolytus unispinosus bark beetles to ethanol in water-stressed Douglas-fir branches [J].
Kelsey, RG ;
Joseph, G .
FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2001, 144 (1-3) :229-238