Psychometric Analysis of the Ten-Item Perceived Stress Scale

被引:311
作者
Taylor, John M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Dept Educ Sch & Counseling Psychol, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
关键词
differential item functioning; graded response model; item response theory; confirmatory factor analysis; perceived stress; CONFIRMATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS; TESTING MEASUREMENT INVARIANCE; ITEM RESPONSE THEORY; OF-FIT INDEXES; SAMPLE; RELIABILITY; RECOVERY; VALIDITY; VERSION; GENDER;
D O I
10.1037/a0038100
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Although the 10-item Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) is a popular measure, a review of the literature reveals 3 significant gaps: (a) There is some debate as to whether a 1- or a 2-factor model best describes the relationships among the PSS-10 items, (b) little information is available on the performance of the items on the scale, and (c) it is unclear whether PSS-10 scores are subject to gender bias. These gaps were addressed in this study using a sample of 1,236 adults from the National Survey of Midlife Development in the United States II. Based on self-identification, participants were 56.31% female, 77% White, 17.31% Black and/ or African American, and the average age was 54.48 years (SD = 11.69). Findings from an ordinal confirmatory factor analysis suggested the relationships among the items are best described by an oblique 2-factor model. Item analysis using the graded response model provided no evidence of item misfit and indicated both subscales have a wide estimation range. Although t tests revealed a significant difference between the means of males and females on the Perceived Helplessness Subscale (t = 4.001, df = 1234, p < .001), measurement invariance tests suggest that PSS-10 scores may not be substantially affected by gender bias. Overall, the findings suggest that inferences made using PSS-10 scores are valid. However, this study calls into question inferences where the multidimensionality of the PSS-10 is ignored.
引用
收藏
页码:90 / 101
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Practical assessment, research evaluation, DOI [https://doi.org/10.7275/wjnc-nm63, DOI 10.7275/WJNC-NM63]
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Journal of Statistical Software, DOI DOI 10.18637/JSS.V017.I05
[4]  
Baker FB., 2004, ITEM RESPONSE THEORY, DOI DOI 10.1201/9781482276725
[5]   Measurement Invariance of the Perceived Stress Scale and Latent Mean Differences across Gender and Time [J].
Barbosa-Leiker, Celestina ;
Kostick, Marylynne ;
Lei, Ming ;
McPherson, Sterling ;
Roper, Virginia ;
Hoekstra, Trynke ;
Wright, Bruce .
STRESS AND HEALTH, 2013, 29 (03) :253-260
[6]  
Brim OG, 2004, MAC FDN MEN, P1
[7]  
Bryant F.B., 2013, EXCEL macro file for conducting scaled difference chisquare tests via LISREL 8, LISREL 9, EQS, and Mplus
[8]   Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance [J].
Chen, Fang Fang .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2007, 14 (03) :464-504
[9]   Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance [J].
Cheung, GW ;
Rensvold, RB .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2002, 9 (02) :233-255
[10]  
Christensen R.H. B., 2011, Ordinal|regression models for ordinal data