Choosing Appropriate Quantitative Safety Risk Criteria: Applications from the New CCPS Guidelines

被引:11
作者
Frank, Walt [1 ]
Jones, Dave [2 ]
机构
[1] Frank Risk Solut Inc, Wilmington, DE 19806 USA
[2] Chevron Energy Technol Co, Richmond, CA 94804 USA
关键词
risk criteria; QRA; individual risk; societal risk; risk decision making;
D O I
10.1002/prs.10404
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
In some situations, risk can be best understood, and therefore managed, through risk quantification. Establishing quantitative risk criteria can be a key component in informed risk decision making. Currently many companies use quantitative risk criteria, either formally or informally. Some companies base their criteria on regulatory precedents (e.g., Netherlands, UK HSE, etc.), while others have developed "home grown'' criteria, involving company-specific judgments. This article will provide an overview of the new American Institute of Chemical Engineers, CCPS Guidelines for Developing Quantitative Safety Risk Criteria, which is intended to provide assistance to companies seeking to develop such criteria and highlight challenges to be addressed by any company attempting to establish risk criteria. (C) 2010 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Process Saf Prog 29: 293-298, 2010
引用
收藏
页码:293 / 298
页数:6
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, REDUCING RISKS PROTE
[2]  
Center for Chemical Process Safety, 2000, GUID CHEM PROC QUANT
[3]  
*CTR CHEM PROC SAF, 1995, TOOLS MAK AC RISK DE
[4]  
*CTR CHEM PROC SAF, 2000, EV PROC SAF CHEM IND
[5]   Risk guidelines as a risk management tool [J].
Hendershot, DC .
PROCESS SAFETY PROGRESS, 1996, 15 (04) :213-218
[6]   Developing screening risk evaluation criteria for facility siting vapor cloud explosion hazards [J].
Hobbs, DH .
PROCESS SAFETY PROGRESS, 1999, 18 (01) :50-55
[7]   What risk should public accept from chemical process facilities? [J].
Meyer, Ernst ;
Andreassen, Goran ;
Wei, Cindy ;
Shaw, Stephen .
PROCESS SAFETY PROGRESS, 2007, 26 (02) :90-94
[8]   QUANTITATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT IN EUROPE [J].
PASMAN, HJ .
PROCESS SAFETY PROGRESS, 1995, 14 (04) :229-231