Improving Ecological Response Monitoring of Environmental Flows

被引:67
作者
King, Alison J. [1 ,2 ]
Gawne, Ben [3 ,4 ]
Beesley, Leah [2 ,5 ]
Koehn, John D. [2 ]
Nielsen, Daryl L. [3 ]
Price, Amina [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Charles Darwin Univ, Res Inst Environm & Livelihoods, Darwin, NT 0909, Australia
[2] Arthur Rylah Inst Environm Res, Heidelberg, Vic 3084, Australia
[3] Murray Darling Freshwater Res Ctr, Wodonga, Vic 3689, Australia
[4] La Trobe Univ, Wodonga, Vic 3689, Australia
[5] Univ Western Australia, Ctr Excellence Nat Resource Management, Albany 6330, Australia
关键词
Environmental water; River restoration; Conceptual models; Adaptive management; MURRAY-DARLING BASIN; RIVER RESTORATION; COLORADO RIVER; ASSEMBLAGE STRUCTURE; FLOODPLAIN WETLANDS; ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT; WATER MANAGEMENT; FISH ASSEMBLAGES; RECRUITMENT; ABUNDANCE;
D O I
10.1007/s00267-015-0456-6
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Environmental flows are now an important restoration technique in flow-degraded rivers, and with the increasing public scrutiny of their effectiveness and value, the importance of undertaking scientifically robust monitoring is now even more critical. Many existing environmental flow monitoring programs have poorly defined objectives, nonjustified indicator choices, weak experimental designs, poor statistical strength, and often focus on outcomes from a single event. These negative attributes make them difficult to learn from. We provide practical recommendations that aim to improve the performance, scientific robustness, and defensibility of environmental flow monitoring programs. We draw on the literature and knowledge gained from working with stakeholders and managers to design, implement, and monitor a range of environmental flow types. We recommend that (1) environmental flow monitoring programs should be implemented within an adaptive management framework; (2) objectives of environmental flow programs should be well defined, attainable, and based on an agreed conceptual understanding of the system; (3) program and intervention targets should be attainable, measurable, and inform program objectives; (4) intervention monitoring programs should improve our understanding of flow-ecological responses and related conceptual models; (5) indicator selection should be based on conceptual models, objectives, and prioritization approaches; (6) appropriate monitoring designs and statistical tools should be used to measure and determine ecological response; (7) responses should be measured within timeframes that are relevant to the indicator(s); (8) watering events should be treated as replicates of a larger experiment; (9) environmental flow outcomes should be reported using a standard suite of metadata. Incorporating these attributes into future monitoring programs should ensure their outcomes are transferable and measured with high scientific credibility.
引用
收藏
页码:991 / 1005
页数:15
相关论文
共 105 条
[1]   Defining environmental river flow requirements - a review [J].
Acreman, M ;
Dunbar, MJ .
HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2004, 8 (05) :861-876
[2]   Ecological success in stream restoration: Case studies from the midwestern United States [J].
Alexander, Gretchen G. ;
Allan, J. David .
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2007, 40 (02) :245-255
[3]  
Anderson DR, 2001, WILDLIFE SOC B, V29, P1294
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2012, ENV FLOWS SAVING RIV
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2003, DEV CONCEPTUAL MODEL
[6]  
[Anonymous], MDFRC PUBLICATION
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Technical report 1/2004
[8]   When can we ignore the problem of imperfect detection in comparative studies? [J].
Archaux, Frederic ;
Henry, Pierre-Yves ;
Gimenez, Olivier .
METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2012, 3 (01) :188-194
[9]  
Arthington AH, 2006, ECOL APPL, V16, P1311, DOI 10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[1311:TCOPEF]2.0.CO
[10]  
2