Solving urban transit route design problem using selection hyper-heuristics

被引:68
作者
Ahmed, Leena [1 ]
Mumford, Christine [1 ]
Kheiri, Ahmed [2 ]
机构
[1] Cardiff Univ, Sch Comp Sci, Queens Bldg,5 Parade, Cardiff CF24 3AA, S Glam, Wales
[2] Univ Lancaster, Dept Management Sci Lancaster, Lancaster LA1 4YX, England
关键词
Transportation; Optimisation; Routing; Meta-heuristics; NETWORK DESIGN; GENETIC ALGORITHM; OPTIMIZATION; SYSTEMS; DEMAND; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2018.10.022
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The urban transit routing problem (UTRP) focuses on finding efficient travelling routes for vehicles in a public transportation system. It is one of the most significant problems faced by transit planners and city authorities throughout the world. This problem belongs to the class of difficult combinatorial problems, whose optimal solution is hard to find with the complexity that arises from the large search space, and the number of constraints imposed in constructing the solution. Hyper-heuristics have emerged as general-purpose search techniques that explore the space of low level heuristics to improve a given solution under an iterative framework. In this work, we evaluate the performance of a set of selection hyper-heuristics on the route design problem of bus networks, with the goal of minimising the passengers' travel time, and the operator's costs. Each selection hyper-heuristic is empirically tested on a set of benchmark instances and statistically compared to the other selection hyper-heuristics to determine the best approach. A sequence-based selection method combined with the great deluge acceptance method achieved the best performance, succeeding in finding improved results in much faster run times over the current best known solutions. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:545 / 559
页数:15
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2016, PUBLIC TRANSIT PLANN
[2]   Efficient transit network design and frequencies setting multi-objective optimization by alternating objective genetic algorithm [J].
Arbex, Renato Oliveira ;
da Cunha, Claudio Barbieri .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 2015, 81 :355-376
[3]  
Baaj M. H., 1991, Journal of Advanced Transportation, V25, P187, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1002/atr.5670250205, DOI 10.1002/ATR.5670250205]
[4]   HYBRID ROUTE GENERATION HEURISTIC ALGORITHM FOR THE DESIGN OF TRANSIT NETWORKS [J].
BAAJ, MH ;
MAHMASSANI, HS .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART C-EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 1995, 3 (01) :31-50
[5]   Transit-network design methodology for actual-size road networks [J].
Bagloee, Saeed Asadi ;
Ceder, Avishai .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 2011, 45 (10) :1787-1804
[6]  
Bilgin B., 2006, P INT C PRACT THEOR, P394, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-77345-0_25
[7]  
Burke E. K., 2008, P PAT 2008 C CAN
[8]   Hyper-heuristics: a survey of the state of the art [J].
Burke, Edmund K. ;
Gendreau, Michel ;
Hyde, Matthew ;
Kendall, Graham ;
Ochoa, Gabriela ;
Oezcan, Ender ;
Qu, Rong .
JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2013, 64 (12) :1695-1724
[9]  
Burke EK, 2010, INT SER OPER RES MAN, V146, P449, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-1665-5_15
[10]   PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION LINE POSITIONS AND HEADWAYS FOR MINIMUM USER AND SYSTEM COST IN A RADIAL CASE [J].
BYRNE, BF .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH, 1975, 9 (2-3) :97-102