Are Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Targeted Biopsies Noninferior to Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Systematic Biopsies for the Detection of Prostate Cancer?

被引:40
作者
Delongchamps, Nicolas Barry [1 ,2 ]
Portalez, Daniel [3 ]
Bruguiere, Eric [4 ]
Rouviere, Olivier [5 ,6 ]
Malavaud, Bernard [3 ]
Mozer, Pierre [5 ,6 ]
Fiard, Gaelle [7 ]
Cornud, Francois [1 ]
机构
[1] Cochin Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Paris, France
[2] Paris Descartes Univ, INSERM, Unit U1151, Paris, France
[3] Rangueil Univ Hosp, Toulouse, France
[4] Clin Pasteur, Toulouse, France
[5] Hop Edouard Herriot, Dept Urinary & Vasc Radiol, Hosp Civils Lyon, Lyon, France
[6] Univ Lyon 1, Lyon, France
[7] Grenoble Univ Hosp, Grenoble, France
关键词
prostatic neoplasms; biopsy; magnetic resonance imaging; ultrasonography; diagnosis; GUIDELINES; DIAGNOSIS; VOLUME;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2016.04.003
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: In men with suspicion of prostate cancer the standard of cancer detection is transrectal ultrasound guided 10 to 12-core systematic biopsy. The targeted biopsy only strategy using magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound image registration is gaining in popularity. We assessed the non-inferiority of targeted vs systematic biopsy. Materials and Methods: Between June and October 2014 a total of 108 biopsy naive patients with prostate specific antigen between 4 and 20 ng/ml, normal rectal examination and a single suspicious image on magnetic resonance imaging were included in study at 7 centers. Patients underwent systematic biopsy by a first operator blinded to magnetic resonance imaging, immediately followed by 3 targeted biopsies within the suspicious image by a second operator. The primary end point was the cancer detection rate. The noninferiority margin was set at -5%. The secondary end points were the detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer (maximum cancer core length 5 mm or greater for Gleason 6 or any Gleason 7 or greater disease) and procedure duration. Results: Systematic and targeted biopsies detected cancer in 66 (61.1%) and 61 patients (56.5%), respectively. The mean difference was -4.5% with a 95% CI lower bound of -11.8%. A total of 13 patients with protocol violations were excluded from the per protocol analysis, which showed a mean difference of -5.2% with a 95% CI lower bound of -13.1%. Clinically significant prostate cancer was detected in 50 (46.2%) and 52 patients (48.1%) with systematic and targeted biopsies, respectively (p = 0.69). The mean +/- SD duration of image fusion plus targeted biopsy was 16.7 +/- 7 minutes vs 7.4 +/- 3 for systematic biopsy (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Targeted biopsy seemed to be inferior to systematic biopsy for overall cancer detection. Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer did not differ between targeted and systematic biopsies.
引用
收藏
页码:1069 / 1075
页数:7
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   Simple improved confidence intervals for comparing matched proportions [J].
Agresti, A ;
Min, YY .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2005, 24 (05) :729-740
[2]   A Randomized Controlled Trial To Assess and Compare the Outcomes of Two-core Prostate Biopsy Guided by Fused Magnetic Resonance and Transrectal Ultrasound Images and Traditional 12-core Systematic Biopsy [J].
Baco, Eduard ;
Rud, Erik ;
Eri, Lars Magne ;
Moen, Gunnar ;
Vlatkovic, Ljiljana ;
Svindland, Aud ;
Eggesbo, Heidi B. ;
Ukimura, Osamu .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (01) :149-156
[3]   ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012 [J].
Barentsz, Jelle O. ;
Richenberg, Jonathan ;
Clements, Richard ;
Choyke, Peter ;
Verma, Sadhna ;
Villeirs, Geert ;
Rouviere, Olivier ;
Logager, Vibeke ;
Futterer, Jurgen J. .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2012, 22 (04) :746-757
[4]   Optimization of Initial Prostate Biopsy in Clinical Practice: Sampling, Labeling and Specimen Processing [J].
Bjurlin, Marc A. ;
Carter, H. Ballentine ;
Schellhammer, Paul ;
Cookson, Michael S. ;
Gomella, Leonard G. ;
Troyer, Dean ;
Wheeler, Thomas M. ;
Schlossberg, Steven ;
Penson, David F. ;
Taneja, Samir S. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (06) :2039-2046
[5]   Differences in Treatment and Outcome After Treatment with Curative Intent in the Screening and Control Arms of the ERSPC Rotterdam [J].
Bokhorst, Leonard P. ;
Kranse, Ries ;
Venderbos, Lionne D. F. ;
Salman, Jolanda W. ;
van Leenders, Geert J. L. H. ;
Schroder, Fritz H. ;
Bangma, Chris H. ;
Roobol, Monique J. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2015, 68 (02) :179-182
[6]   Underestimation of Gleason score at prostate biopsy reflects sampling error in lower volume tumours [J].
Corcoran, Niall M. ;
Hovens, Chris M. ;
Hong, Matthew K. H. ;
Pedersen, John ;
Casey, Rowan G. ;
Connolly, Stephen ;
Peters, Justin ;
Harewood, Laurence ;
Gleave, Martin E. ;
Goldenberg, S. Larry ;
Costello, Anthony J. .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 109 (05) :660-664
[7]   Value of Multiparametric MRI in the Work-up of Prostate Cancer [J].
Cornud, F. ;
Delongchamps, N. B. ;
Mozer, P. ;
Beuvon, F. ;
Schull, A. ;
Muradyan, N. ;
Peyromaure, M. .
CURRENT UROLOGY REPORTS, 2012, 13 (01) :82-92
[8]   The potential impact of prostate volume in the planning of optimal number of cores in the systematic transperineal prostate biopsy [J].
Ficarra, V ;
Novella, G ;
Novara, G ;
Galfano, A ;
Pea, M ;
Martignoni, G ;
Artibani, W .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2005, 48 (06) :932-937
[9]   Needle biopsies on autopsy prostates: Sensitivity of cancer detection based on true prevalence [J].
Haas, Gabriel P. ;
Delongchamps, Nicolas Barry ;
Jones, Richard F. ;
Chandan, Vishal ;
Serio, Angel M. ;
Vickers, Andrew J. ;
Jumbelic, Mary ;
Threatte, Gregory ;
Korets, Rus ;
Lilja, Hans ;
de la Roza, Gustavo .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2007, 99 (19) :1484-1489
[10]   EAU Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part II: Treatment of Advanced, Relapsing, and Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer [J].
Heidenreich, Axel ;
Bastian, Patrick J. ;
Bellmunt, Joaquim ;
Bolla, Michel ;
Joniau, Steven ;
van der Kwast, Theodor ;
Mason, Malcolm ;
Matveev, Vsevolod ;
Wiegel, Thomas ;
Zattoni, Filiberto ;
Mottet, Nicolas .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2014, 65 (02) :467-479