Greenhouse gas mitigation: Policy options

被引:2
|
作者
Lowe, I
机构
[1] School of Science, Griffith University, Nathan
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0196-8904(95)00249-9
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Reducing greenhouse gas emissions will require changes to the pattern of energy supply and use. Energy use is largely shaped by social factors, as is clear from comparative studies which show that there is no simple Link between energy use and either wealth or climate. The same conclusion emerges from studies of the changing pattern of energy use over time in a given society. Consumer demand is not for energy as an abstract quantity but for energy services such as motive power, transport, heating and lighting. The level of demand for each of these services is largely determined by social factors. There is little evidence for the common belief that the pattern of energy use results from consumers making rational choices in a free market to maximise marginal utility. In many cases, the consumer sees no price signal at the point of use. Where there are partial price signals, as in the case of transport fuels, energy demand is highly inelastic. These considerations are crucial if there is an aim of changing the pattern of energy use. Demand for energy can be influenced by price signals, by legislation or by changing social attitudes. There is a common belief that changing demand could result in unacceptable disruption, based on the scale of price changes needed to influence demand. This body of evidence really shows that increasing prices is not a promising way to influence demand patterns. Changing social attitudes are the key to behavioural change and central to the acceptability of regulatory change. Thus significant alteration in the pattern of energy use is unlikely to occur without an improved understanding of the social dimensions of energy use.
引用
收藏
页码:741 / 746
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The modelling of policy options for greenhouse gas mitigation in India
    Shukla, PR
    AMBIO, 1996, 25 (04) : 240 - 248
  • [2] Policy and technological constraints to implementation of greenhouse gas mitigation options in agriculture
    Smith, Pete
    Martino, Daniel
    Cai, Zucong
    Gwary, Daniel
    Janzen, Henry
    Kumar, Pushpam
    McCarl, Bruce
    Ogle, Stephen
    O'Mara, Frank
    Rice, Charles
    Scholes, Bob
    Sirotenko, Oleg
    Howden, Mark
    McAllister, Tim
    Pan, Genxing
    Romanenkov, Vladimir
    Schneider, Uwe
    Towprayoon, Sirintornthep
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2007, 118 (1-4) : 6 - 28
  • [3] A comparison of greenhouse gas mitigation options
    Reck, RA
    Hoag, KJ
    ENERGY, 1997, 22 (2-3) : 115 - 120
  • [4] Canadian greenhouse gas mitigation options in agriculture
    Desjardins, RL
    Kulshreshtha, SN
    Junkins, B
    Smith, W
    Grant, B
    Boehm, M
    NUTRIENT CYCLING IN AGROECOSYSTEMS, 2001, 60 (1-3) : 317 - 326
  • [5] Selection of appropriate greenhouse gas mitigation options
    Ramanathan, R
    GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 1999, 9 (03): : 203 - 210
  • [6] Canadian greenhouse gas mitigation options in agriculture
    R.L. Desjardins
    S.N. Kulshreshtha
    B. Junkins
    W. Smith
    B. Grant
    M. Boehm
    Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2001, 60 : 317 - 326
  • [7] Economic comparison of greenhouse gas mitigation options in Germany
    Ronald D. Sands
    Katja Schumacher
    Energy Efficiency, 2009, 2 : 17 - 36
  • [8] Economic comparison of greenhouse gas mitigation options in Germany
    Sands, Ronald D.
    Schumacher, Katja
    ENERGY EFFICIENCY, 2009, 2 (01) : 17 - 36
  • [9] Assessing greenhouse gas mitigation options for the Thai power sector
    Intarapravich, D
    AMBIO, 1996, 25 (04) : 233 - 239
  • [10] Prioritising agri-environment options for greenhouse gas mitigation
    Warner, Douglas
    Tzilivakis, John
    Green, Andrew
    Lewis, Kathleen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATE CHANGE STRATEGIES AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 9 (01) : 104 - 122