Patient Activation Increases Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates: A Randomized Trial among Low-Income Minority Patients

被引:56
作者
Katz, Mira L. [1 ,2 ]
Fisher, James L. [2 ]
Fleming, Kelly [3 ]
Paskett, Electra D. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Coll Publ Hlth, Columbus, OH 43201 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Ctr Comprehens Canc, Columbus, OH 43201 USA
[3] Columbus Neighborhood Hlth Ctr Inc, Columbus, OH USA
关键词
DECISION-MAKING; COMMUNICATION; CARE; PARTICIPATION; DISPARITIES; PHYSICIANS; LITERACY; SERVICES; IMPACT; AID;
D O I
10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0815
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates remain low among low-income and minority populations. The purpose of this study was to determine whether providing patients with screening information, activating them to ask for a screening test, and telephone barriers counseling improves CRC screening rates compared with providing screening information only. Methods: Patients were randomized to CRC screening information plus patient activation and barriers counseling (n = 138) or CRC screening information (n = 132). Barriers counseling was attempted among activated patients if screening was not completed after one month. CRC screening test completion was determined by medical record review at two months after the medical visit. Logistic regression was used to determine whether activated patients were more likely to complete CRC screening, after adjustment for confounding factors (e. g., demographic characteristics and CRC knowledge). Results: Patients were African American (72.2%), female (63.7%), had annual household incomes less than $20,000 (60.7%), no health insurance (57.0%), and limited health literacy skills (53.7%). In adjusted analyses, more patients randomized to the activation group completed a screening test (19.6% vs. 9.9%; OR = 2.35, 95% CI: 1.14-5.56; P = 0.020). In addition, more activated patients reported discussing screening with their provider (54.4% vs. 27.5%, OR = 3.29, 95% CI: 1.95-5.56; P < 0.001) and had more screening tests ordered (39.1% vs. 17.6%; OR = 3.40, 95% CI: 1.88-6.15; P < 0.001) compared with those in the control group. Conclusion: Patient activation increased CRC screening rates among low-income minority patients. Impact: Innovative strategies are still needed to increase CRC screening discussions, motivate providers to recommend screening to patients, as well as assist patients to complete ordered screening tests. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 21(1); 45-52. (C) 2011 AACR.
引用
收藏
页码:45 / 52
页数:8
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1983, SOCIAL PSYCHOPHYSIOL
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Cancer Facts and Figures 2011
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, COL CANC FACTS FIG 2
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2008, MMWR-MORBID MORTAL W, V59, P808
[5]   Productivity Savings from Colorectal Cancer Prevention and Control Strategies [J].
Bradley, Cathy J. ;
Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris ;
Yabroff, Robin ;
Dahman, Bassam ;
Mariotto, Angela ;
Feuer, Eric J. ;
Brown, Martin L. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2011, 41 (02) :E5-E14
[6]   The effects of communication skills training on patients' participation during medical interviews [J].
Cegala, DJ ;
McClure, L ;
Marinelli, TM ;
Post, DM .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2000, 41 (02) :209-222
[7]   Patient communication skills training: a review with implications for cancer patients [J].
Cegala, DJ .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2003, 50 (01) :91-94
[8]   Physician communication skills training: a review of theoretical backgrounds, objectives and skills [J].
Cegala, DJ ;
Broz, SL .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2002, 36 (11) :1004-1016
[9]   The effects of patient communication skills training on compliance [J].
Cegala, DJ ;
Marinelli, T ;
Post, D .
ARCHIVES OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2000, 9 (01) :57-64
[10]   The effects of patient communication skills training on the discourse of older patients during a primary care interview [J].
Cegala, DJ ;
Post, DM ;
McClure, L .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2001, 49 (11) :1505-1511