Pandemic Preference Shocks and Inflation in a New Keynesian Model

被引:0
作者
Craighead, William D. D. [1 ]
机构
[1] USAF Acad, Dept Econ & Geosci, 2354 Fairchild Hall, Suite 6k110, USAF Academy, CO 80840 USA
关键词
Labor supply; Relative demand; New Keynesian model; COVID-19; TECHNOLOGY;
D O I
10.1007/s11293-022-09752-7
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper examines two types of preference shocks, shocks to the disutility of working and to the demand for goods relative to services, in an otherwise standard New Keynesian model. Existing literature has primarily focused on productivity and monetary shocks as driving processes. The contribution of this paper is to construct model-based processes for both types of preference shocks using United States data over 1948-2022 from the Bureau of Economic Analysis and Bureau of Labor Statistics and investigate the resulting dynamics in the New Keynesian framework. Constructing historical processes for the shocks provides context for examining the shifts that occurred during the coronavirus pandemic. Both preference shocks show movements of unprecedented magnitude that coincide with the pandemic. In the model, the relative demand shock leads to opposite movements in inflation and labor between the two sectors, while the shock to labor disutility is stagflationary, with inflation rising and output decreasing. A pandemic-motivated experiment with simultaneous large shocks to both labor disutility and relative goods demand generates divergences between the sectors in inflation and labor, but higher inflation and reduced output overall. This demonstrates that preference shocks may be useful for understanding the pandemic-era economy and suggests that they deserve more attention from economists and policymakers.
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 146
页数:14
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
ADJEMIAN S., 2011, DYNARE WORKING PAPER
[2]   Supply and Demand in Disaggregated Keynesian Economies with an Application to the COVID-19 Crisis [J].
Baqaee, David ;
Farhi, Emmanuel .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2022, 112 (05) :1397-1436
[3]  
Bureau of Economic Analysis, 2022, GDP NAT INC
[4]  
Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2022, CIV LAB FORC LEV
[5]   Are Micro and Macro Labor Supply Elasticities Consistent? A Review of Evidence on the Intensive and Extensive Margins [J].
Chetty, Raj ;
Guren, Adam ;
Manoli, Day ;
Weber, Andrea .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2011, 101 (03) :471-475
[6]   The Great Depression and the Friedman-Schwartz hypothesis [J].
Christiano, L ;
Motto, R ;
Rostagno, M .
JOURNAL OF MONEY CREDIT AND BANKING, 2003, 35 (06) :1119-1197
[7]   Has the Willingness to Work Fallen during the Covid Pandemic? [J].
Faberman, R. Jason ;
Mueller, Andreas I. ;
Sahin, Aysegul .
LABOUR ECONOMICS, 2022, 79
[8]  
Fornaro L., 2022, CEPR DISCUSSION PAPE
[9]  
Gali J, 2008, MONETARY POLICY, INFLATION, AND THE BUSINESS CYCLE: AN INTRODUCTION TO THE NEW KEYNESIAN FRAMEWORK, P1
[10]  
Guerrieri V., 2021, U CHICAGO BECKER FRI