Osteoprotegerin: Relationship to Breast Cancer Risk and Prognosis

被引:19
作者
Geerts, Dirk [1 ]
Chopra, Christina [2 ]
Connelly, Linda [2 ]
机构
[1] Acad Med Ctr Amsterdam, Dept Med Biol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Calif Univ Sci & Med, Sch Med, San Bernardino, CA 92408 USA
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2020年 / 10卷
关键词
osteoprotegerin (OPG); TNFRSF11B; breast cancer; risk; prognosis; TNF superfamily; FACTOR-KAPPA-B; BONE-MINERAL DENSITY; RECEPTOR-ACTIVATOR; LIGAND RANKL; GENE POLYMORPHISMS; ESTROGEN-RECEPTOR; OPG; EXPRESSION; CELLS; TRAIL;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2020.00462
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Osteoprotegerin (OPG) is a secreted member of the Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) receptor superfamily (TNFRSF11B), that was first characterized and named for its protective role in bone remodeling. In this context, OPG binds to another TNF superfamily member Receptor Activator of NF-kappaB Ligand (RANKL; TNFSF11) and blocks interaction with RANK (TNFRSF11A), preventing RANKL/RANK stimulation of osteoclast maturation, and bone breakdown. Further studies revealed that OPG protein is also expressed by tumor cells and led to investigation of the role of OPG in tumor biology. An increasing body of data has demonstrated that OPG modulates breast tumor behavior. Initially, research was focused on OPG in the bone microenvironment as a potential inhibitor of RANKL-driven osteolysis. More recently, attention has shifted to include OPG expression and interactions in the primary breast tumor independent of RANKL. In the primary tumor, OPG may interact with another TNF superfamily member, TNF-Related Apoptosis Inducing Ligand (TRAIL; TNFSF10) to prevent apoptosis induction. Additional interest in OPG in breast cancer has been stimulated by the tumor-promoting role of its binding partner RANKL in association with BRCA1 gene mutations. We and others have previously summarized the functional studies on OPG and breast cancer (1, 2). After basic research studies on the in vitro role for OPG (and RANKL) in breast cancer, the field now expands to assess the in vivo role for OPG by examining the correlation between OPG expression and breast cancer risk or patient prognosis. However, the data reported so far is conflicting, since OPG expression appears linked to both good and poor patient survival. In the current review we will summarize these studies. Our goal is to provide stimulus for further research to bridge the basic research findings and clinical data regarding OPG in breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] The Eighth Edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: Continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more "personalized" approach to cancer staging
    Amin, Mahul B.
    Greene, Frederick L.
    Edge, Stephen B.
    Compton, Carolyn C.
    Gershenwald, Jeffrey E.
    Brookland, Robert K.
    Meyer, Laura
    Gress, Donna M.
    Byrd, David R.
    Winchester, David P.
    [J]. CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2017, 67 (02) : 93 - 99
  • [2] Sequence variations in the osteoprotegerin gene promoter in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis
    Arko, B
    Prezelj, J
    Komel, R
    Kocijancic, A
    Hudler, P
    Marc, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2002, 87 (09) : 4080 - 4084
  • [3] RANKL and OPG gene polymorphisms: associations with vertebral fractures and bone mineral density in premenopausal systemic lupus erythematosus
    Bonfa, A. C.
    Seguro, L. P. C.
    Caparbo, V.
    Bonfa, E.
    Pereira, R. M. R.
    [J]. OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 26 (05) : 1563 - 1571
  • [4] Osteoprotegerin mediates tumor-promoting effects of Interleukin-1beta in breast cancer cells
    Chung, Stephanie Tsang Mui
    Geerts, Dirk
    Roseman, Kim
    Renaud, Ashleigh
    Connelly, Linda
    [J]. MOLECULAR CANCER, 2017, 16
  • [5] Expression of receptor activator of nuclear factor κβ ligand (RANKL) and tumour necrosis factor related, apoptosis inducing ligand (TRAIL) in breast cancer, and their relations with osteoprotegerin, oestrogen receptor, and clinicopathological variables
    Cross, SS
    Harrison, RF
    Balasubramanian, SP
    Lippitt, JM
    Evans, CA
    Reed, MWR
    Holen, I
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2006, 59 (07) : 716 - 720
  • [6] The anti-tumor effect of RANKL inhibition in malignant solid tumors - A systematic review
    de Groot, A. F.
    Appelman-Dijkstra, N. M.
    van der Burg, S. H.
    Kroep, J. R.
    [J]. CANCER TREATMENT REVIEWS, 2018, 62 : 18 - 28
  • [7] Osteoprotegerin and breast cancer risk by hormone receptor subtype: a nested case-control study in the EPIC cohort
    Fortner, Renee T.
    Sarink, Danja
    Schock, Helena
    Johnson, Theron
    Tjonneland, Anne
    Olsen, Anja
    Overvad, Kim
    Affret, Aurelie
    His, Mathilde
    Boutron-Ruault, Marie-Christine
    Boeing, Heiner
    Trichopoulou, Antonia
    Naska, Androniki
    Orfanos, Philippos
    Palli, Domenico
    Sieri, Sabina
    Mattiello, Amalia
    Tumino, Rosario
    Ricceri, Fulvio
    Bueno-de-Mesquita, H. Bas
    Peeters, Petra H. M.
    Van Gils, Carla H.
    Weiderpass, Elisabete
    Lund, Eiliv
    Quiros, J. Ramon
    Agudo, Antonio
    Sanchez, Maria-Jose
    Chirlaque, Maria-Dolores
    Ardanaz, Eva
    Dorronsoro, Miren
    Key, Tim
    Khaw, Kay-Tee
    Rinaldi, Sabina
    Dossus, Laure
    Gunter, Marc
    Merritt, Melissa A.
    Riboli, Elio
    Kaaks, Rudolf
    [J]. BMC MEDICINE, 2017, 15
  • [8] Osteoprotegerin rich tumor microenvironment: implications in breast cancer
    Goswami, Sudeshna
    Sharma-Walia, Neelam
    [J]. ONCOTARGET, 2016, 7 (27) : 42777 - 42791
  • [9] Osteoprotegerin secreted by inflammatory and invasive breast cancer cells induces aneuploidy, cell proliferation and angiogenesis
    Goswami, Sudeshna
    Sharma-Walia, Neelam
    [J]. BMC CANCER, 2015, 15
  • [10] Osteoprotegerin (OPG) expression by breast cancer cells in vitro and breast tumours in vivo -: a role in tumour cell survival?
    Holen, I
    Cross, SS
    Neville-Webbe, HL
    Cross, NA
    Balasubramanian, SP
    Croucher, PI
    Evans, CA
    Lippitt, JM
    Coleman, RE
    Eaton, CL
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2005, 92 (03) : 207 - 215