CONTRACEPTION AND THE DEMOGRAPHIC TRANSITION

被引:14
作者
Bhattacharya, Joydeep
Chakraborty, Shankha
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Ames, IA USA
[2] Univ Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403 USA
关键词
FERTILITY DECLINE; CHILD-MORTALITY; CHOICE;
D O I
10.1111/ecoj.12431
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Inspired by the historical English experience, we modify the Beckerian paradigm of fertility by incorporating costly, societal influence on contraception. Heterogeneous, generationally-linked households choose between 'traditional' and 'modern' contraception. The modern has a higher fixed but lower variable cost of averting childbirths. Initially the rich adopt the modern, which unleashes society-wide diffusion. Eventually everyone switches, lowering fertility further and across households. Hastening the switch is falling child mortality. Quantitative experiments suggest contraception was a vital link between the historical mortality and fertility transitions, though not the latter's proximate cause. Implications for more recent transitions are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:2263 / 2301
页数:39
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1992, DEMOGRAPHIC TRANSITI
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, STORY SOCIAL SPENDIN
[3]   2 SUCCESSIVE MOTIVATIONS FOR THE DECLINING BIRTH-RATE IN THE WEST [J].
ARIES, P .
POPULATION AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, 1980, 6 (04) :645-650
[4]   Household Bargaining and Excess Fertility: An Experimental Study in Zambia [J].
Ashraf, Nava ;
Field, Erica ;
Lee, Jean .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2014, 104 (07) :2210-2237
[5]   Demographic transition and industrial revolution: A macroeconomic investigation [J].
Bar, Michael ;
Leukhina, Oksana .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS, 2010, 13 (02) :424-451
[6]  
Baudin T, 2015, 20153 U CATH LOUV
[7]   A ROLE FOR CULTURAL TRANSMISSION IN FERTILITY TRANSITIONS [J].
Baudin, Thomas .
MACROECONOMIC DYNAMICS, 2010, 14 (04) :454-481
[8]  
Becker G., 1991, TREATISE FAMILY
[9]  
Becker G S., DEMOGRAPHIC EC CHANG, P209
[10]   Fertility choice under child mortality and social norms [J].
Bhattacharya, Joydeep ;
Chakraborty, Shankha .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2012, 115 (03) :338-341