The influence of complementarity, compatibility, and relationship capital on alliance performance

被引:425
作者
Sarkar, MB [1 ]
Echambadi, R
Cavusgil, ST
Aulakh, PS
机构
[1] Univ Cent Florida, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
[2] Michigan State Univ, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[3] Temple Univ, Fox Sch Business & Management, Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1177/03079450094216
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Value creation through alliances requires the simultaneous pursuit of partners with similar characteristics on certain dimensions and different characteristics on other dimensions. Partnering firms need to have different resource and capability profiles yet share similarities in their social institutions. In this article, the authors empirically examine the impact of partner characteristics on the performance of alliances. In particular, they test hypotheses related to both direct impact of partner characteristics on alliance performance and indirect effects through relational capital aspects of the alliance. Empirical results based on a sample of alliances in the global construction contracting industry suggest that complementarity in partner resources and compatibility in cultural and operational norms have different direct and indirect effects on alliance performance. Accordingly, organizational routines aimed at partner selection need to be complemented by relationship management routines to maximize the potential benefits from an alliance.
引用
收藏
页码:358 / 373
页数:16
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]   Changes in the theory of interorganizational relations in marketing: Toward a network paradigm [J].
Achrol, RS .
JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF MARKETING SCIENCE, 1997, 25 (01) :56-71
[2]   STRATEGIC ASSETS AND ORGANIZATIONAL RENT [J].
AMIT, R ;
SCHOEMAKER, PJH .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1993, 14 (01) :33-46
[3]   THE USE OF PLEDGES TO BUILD AND SUSTAIN COMMITMENT IN DISTRIBUTION CHANNELS [J].
ANDERSON, E ;
WEITZ, B .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1992, 29 (01) :18-34
[4]   DETERMINANTS OF CONTINUITY IN CONVENTIONAL INDUSTRIAL CHANNEL DYADS [J].
ANDERSON, E ;
WEITZ, B .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 1989, 8 (04) :310-323
[5]   A MODEL OF DISTRIBUTOR FIRM AND MANUFACTURER FIRM WORKING PARTNERSHIPS [J].
ANDERSON, JC ;
NARUS, JA .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 1990, 54 (01) :42-58
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1997, COOPERATIVE STRATEGI
[7]   ESTIMATING NONRESPONSE BIAS IN MAIL SURVEYS [J].
ARMSTRONG, JS ;
OVERTON, TS .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1977, 14 (03) :396-402
[8]   Trust and performance in cross-border marketing partnerships: A behavioral approach [J].
Aulakh, PS ;
Kotabe, M ;
Sahay, A .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES, 1996, 27 (05) :1005-1032
[9]  
Badaracco J., 1991, The knowledge link: How firms compete through strategic alliances
[10]   FIRM RESOURCES AND SUSTAINED COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE [J].
BARNEY, J .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1991, 17 (01) :99-120