A fuzzy logic and probabilistic hybrid approach to quantify the uncertainty in layer of protection analysis

被引:32
作者
Hong, Yizhi [1 ]
Pasman, Hans J. [1 ]
Sachdeva, Sonny [1 ]
Markowski, Adam S. [2 ]
Mannan, M. Sam [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Artie McFerrin Dept Chem Engn, Mary Kay OConnor Proc Safety Ctr, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[2] Tech Univ Lodz, Fac Proc & Environm Engn, Proc Safety & Ecol Div, Ul Wolczanska 213, PL-90924 Lodz, Poland
关键词
Risk assessment; Layer of protection analysis; Fuzzy logic; INHERENT SAFETY INDEX; FAULT-TREE ANALYSIS; RISK-ASSESSMENT; LOPA; SYSTEM; SETS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jlp.2016.04.006
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Layer of protection analysis (LOPA) is a widely used semi-quantitative risk assessment method. It provides a simplified and less precise method to assess the effectiveness of protection layers and the residual risk of an incident scenario. The outcome failure frequency and consequence of that residual risk are intended to be conservative by prudently selecting input data, given that design specification and component manufacturer's data are often overly optimistic. There are many influencing factors, including design deficiencies, lack of layer independence, availability, human factors, wear by testing and maintenance shortcomings, which are not quantified and are dependent on type of process and location. This makes the risk in LOPA usually overestimated. Therefore, to make decisions for a cost-effective system, different sources and types of uncertainty in the LOPA model need to be identified and quantified. In this study, a fuzzy logic and probabilistic hybrid approach was developed to determine the mean and to quantify the uncertainty of frequency of an initiating event and the probabilities of failure on demand (PFD) of independent protection layers (IPLs). It is based on the available data and expert judgment. The method was applied to a distillation system with a capacity to distill 40 tons of flammable n-hexane. The outcome risk of the new method has been proven to be more precise compared to results from the conventional LOPA approach. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:10 / 17
页数:8
相关论文
共 37 条
[31]   Bayesian networks make LOPA more effective, QRA more transparent and flexible, and thus safety more definable! [J].
Pasman, Hans ;
Rogers, William .
JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2013, 26 (03) :434-442
[32]   Uncertainties in risk analysis: Six levels of treatment [J].
PateCornell, ME .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 1996, 54 (2-3) :95-111
[33]   ISO 31000:2009-Setting a New Standard for Risk Management [J].
Purdy, Grant .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2010, 30 (06) :881-886
[34]   UNCERTAINTY REPRESENTATION AND PROPAGATION IN QUANTIFIED RISK ASSESSMENT USING FUZZY-SETS [J].
QUELCH, J ;
CAMERON, IT .
JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 1994, 7 (06) :463-473
[35]   A FUZZY SET APPROACH TO FAULT TREE AND RELIABILITY-ANALYSIS [J].
SINGER, D .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1990, 34 (02) :145-155
[36]   Uncertainty techniques in liquefied natural gas (LNG) dispersion calculations [J].
Siuta, Dorota ;
Markowski, Adam S. ;
Mannan, M. Sam .
JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2013, 26 (03) :418-426
[37]   FUZZY SETS [J].
ZADEH, LA .
INFORMATION AND CONTROL, 1965, 8 (03) :338-&