Multi-criteria algorithms for portfolio optimization under practical constraints

被引:41
作者
Meghwani, Suraj S. [1 ]
Thakur, Manoj [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol Mandi, Suran, Himachal Prades, India
关键词
Portfolio optimization; Multi-objective optimization; Cardinality constrained portfolio problem; Repair mechanism; MULTIOBJECTIVE EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS; CODED GENETIC ALGORITHMS; OF-THE-ART; HEURISTIC ALGORITHMS; MUTATION OPERATOR; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.swevo.2017.06.005
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Selection of promising assets and allocating capital among them is a crucial part of the financial decision making process. Modern portfolio theory formulated it as a quadratic optimization problem of maximizing expected returns and minimizing the risk of the portfolio. This problem was modified to incorporate investor's preferences resulting in discrete non-linear search space which cannot be handled by traditional quadratic programming approaches. Relevant literature shows the success of evolutionary algorithms in modelling some of these preferences Multi-criteria algorithms for portfolio optimization under practical constraintsin a constrained optimization problem. This study proposes a candidate generation procedure and a repair mechanism for practical portfolio optimization model in multi-objective evolutionary algorithm (MOEA) settings. Both these methods together can handle a larger class of constraints namely cardinality, pre assignment, budget, quantity (floor and ceiling) and round-lot constraints. Proposed methods can easily be incorporated into existing evolutionary algorithms. To evaluate their effectiveness, four MOEAs namely Non dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm-II (NSGA-II), Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm 2 (SPEA2), Global Weighting Achievement Scalarizing Function Genetic Algorithm (GWASFGA) and Pareto Envelope-based Selection Algorithm-II (PESA-II) have been adapted and their capability of approximating unconstrained efficient frontier are discussed. For empirical testing, seven datasets involving maximum up to 1290 assets are used. All 'the adapted algorithms are compared and evaluated on the basis of five well-known performance metrics for MORAs. The potential of our adapted algorithms is presented in comparison with existing MOEAs for the identical problems.
引用
收藏
页码:104 / 125
页数:22
相关论文
共 49 条
[21]   Multiobjective optimization using differential evolution for real-world portfolio optimization [J].
Krink T. ;
Paterlini S. .
Computational Management Science, 2011, 8 (1-2) :157-179
[22]   Efficient Portfolio Construction with the Use of Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms: Best Practices and Performance Metrics [J].
Liagkouras, K. ;
Metaxiotis, K. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2015, 14 (03) :535-564
[23]   A new Probe Guided Mutation operator and its application for solving the cardinality constrained portfolio optimization problem [J].
Liagkouras, K. ;
Metaxiotis, K. .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2014, 41 (14) :6274-6290
[24]  
Lin S., 2016, NEUROCOMPUTING
[25]   A learning-guided multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for constrained portfolio optimization [J].
Lwin, Khin ;
Qu, Rong ;
Kendall, Graham .
APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2014, 24 :757-772
[26]   Heuristic algorithms for the portfolio selection problem with minimum transaction lots [J].
Mansini, R ;
Speranza, MG .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1999, 114 (02) :219-233
[27]   PORTFOLIO SELECTION [J].
Markowitz, Harry .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1952, 7 (01) :77-91
[28]   Multi-objective optimization of water distribution systems based on a real options approach [J].
Marques, Joao ;
Cunha, Maria ;
Savic, Dragan A. .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2015, 63 :1-13
[29]  
Moral-Escudero R., IEEE C EV COMP 2006, P2382
[30]   Evolutionary multi-objective optimisation: a survey [J].
Nedjah, Nadia ;
Mourelle, Luiza de Macedo .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIO-INSPIRED COMPUTATION, 2015, 7 (01) :1-25