Multi-criteria algorithms for portfolio optimization under practical constraints

被引:41
作者
Meghwani, Suraj S. [1 ]
Thakur, Manoj [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol Mandi, Suran, Himachal Prades, India
关键词
Portfolio optimization; Multi-objective optimization; Cardinality constrained portfolio problem; Repair mechanism; MULTIOBJECTIVE EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS; CODED GENETIC ALGORITHMS; OF-THE-ART; HEURISTIC ALGORITHMS; MUTATION OPERATOR; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.swevo.2017.06.005
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Selection of promising assets and allocating capital among them is a crucial part of the financial decision making process. Modern portfolio theory formulated it as a quadratic optimization problem of maximizing expected returns and minimizing the risk of the portfolio. This problem was modified to incorporate investor's preferences resulting in discrete non-linear search space which cannot be handled by traditional quadratic programming approaches. Relevant literature shows the success of evolutionary algorithms in modelling some of these preferences Multi-criteria algorithms for portfolio optimization under practical constraintsin a constrained optimization problem. This study proposes a candidate generation procedure and a repair mechanism for practical portfolio optimization model in multi-objective evolutionary algorithm (MOEA) settings. Both these methods together can handle a larger class of constraints namely cardinality, pre assignment, budget, quantity (floor and ceiling) and round-lot constraints. Proposed methods can easily be incorporated into existing evolutionary algorithms. To evaluate their effectiveness, four MOEAs namely Non dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm-II (NSGA-II), Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm 2 (SPEA2), Global Weighting Achievement Scalarizing Function Genetic Algorithm (GWASFGA) and Pareto Envelope-based Selection Algorithm-II (PESA-II) have been adapted and their capability of approximating unconstrained efficient frontier are discussed. For empirical testing, seven datasets involving maximum up to 1290 assets are used. All 'the adapted algorithms are compared and evaluated on the basis of five well-known performance metrics for MORAs. The potential of our adapted algorithms is presented in comparison with existing MOEAs for the identical problems.
引用
收藏
页码:104 / 125
页数:22
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   The mean-variance cardinality constrained portfolio optimization problem: An experimental evaluation of five multiobjective evolutionary algorithms [J].
Anagnostopoulos, K. P. ;
Mamanis, G. .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2011, 38 (11) :14208-14217
[2]   A portfolio optimization model with three objectives and discrete variables [J].
Anagnostopoulos, K. P. ;
Mamanis, G. .
COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2010, 37 (07) :1285-1297
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, MEAN VARIANCE ANAL P
[4]  
[Anonymous], TIK REP
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1994, COMPLEX SYST
[6]   OR-LIBRARY - DISTRIBUTING TEST PROBLEMS BY ELECTRONIC MAIL [J].
BEASLEY, JE .
JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 1990, 41 (11) :1069-1072
[7]   Portfolio optimization with an envelope-based multi-objective evolutionary algorithm [J].
Branke, J. ;
Scheckenbach, B. ;
Stein, M. ;
Deb, K. ;
Schmeck, H. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2009, 199 (03) :684-693
[8]   Mixed-integer programming approaches for index tracking and enhanced indexation [J].
Canakgoz, N. A. ;
Beasley, J. E. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2009, 196 (01) :384-399
[9]   Heuristics for cardinality constrained portfolio optimisation [J].
Chang, TJ ;
Meade, N ;
Beasley, JE ;
Sharaiha, YM .
COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2000, 27 (13) :1271-1302
[10]   Evolutionary Multi-objective Portfolio Optimization in Practical Context [J].
Chiam, S. C. ;
Tan, K. C. ;
Al Mamum, A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUTOMATION AND COMPUTING, 2008, 5 (01) :67-80