Fractal dimension as an indicator for quantifying the effects of changing spatial scales on landscape metrics

被引:64
作者
Feng, Yongjiu [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Yan [3 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Ocean Univ, Coll Marine Sci, Shanghai 201306, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Ocean Univ, Key Lab Sustainable Exploitat Ocean Fisheries Res, Shanghai 201306, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Queensland, Sch Geog Planning & Environm Management, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
基金
上海市自然科学基金; 中国国家自然科学基金; 高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金;
关键词
Landscape metrics; Scale effects; Coefficient of determination (COD); Fractal dimension (FD); FRAGSTATS; STATISTICAL SELF-SIMILARITY; CELLULAR-AUTOMATA; URBAN-GROWTH; PATTERN; BIODIVERSITY; GEOMETRY; ECOLOGY; COMPLEXITY; DEPENDENCE; RESOLUTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.01.020
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
While geographers and ecologists are well aware of the scale effects of landscape patterns, there is still a need for quantifying these effects. This paper applies the fractal method to measure the scale (grain or cell size) sensitivity of landscape metrics at both landscape and class levels using the Gold Coast City in Southeast Queensland, Australia as a case study. By transforming the original land use polygon data into raster data at eleven aggregate scales, the fractal dimensions of 57 landscape metrics as defined in FRAGSTATS were assessed. A series of linear log log regression models were constructed based on the power law to obtain the coefficient of determination (COD or R-2) of the models and the fractal dimension (FD) of the landscape metrics. The results show that most landscape metrics in the area and edge, shape and the aggregation groups exhibit a fractal law that is consistent over a range of scales. The six variations of several landscape metrics that belong to both the area/edge and shape groups show different scale behaviours and effects. However, the metrics that belong to the diversity group are scale-independent and do not accord to fractal laws. In addition, the scale effects at the class level are more complex than those at the landscape level. The quantitative assessment of the scale effect using the fractal method provides a basis for investigating landscape patterns when upscaling or downscaling as well as creating any scale-free metric to understand landscape patterns. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:18 / 27
页数:10
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Mediterranean drylands: The effect of grain size and domain of scale on landscape metrics [J].
Alhamad, Mohammad N. ;
Alrababah, Mohammad A. ;
Feagin, Rusty A. ;
Gharaibeh, Anne .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2011, 11 (02) :611-621
[2]   Considering spatial and temporal scale in landscape-genetic studies of gene flow [J].
Anderson, Corey Devin ;
Epperson, Bryan K. ;
Fortin, Marie-Josee ;
Holderegger, Rolf ;
James, Patrick M. A. ;
Rosenberg, Michael S. ;
Scribner, Kim T. ;
Spear, Stephen .
MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2010, 19 (17) :3565-3575
[3]   Complexity and scale in geomorphology: Statistical self-similarity vs characteristic scales [J].
Andrle, R .
MATHEMATICAL GEOLOGY, 1996, 28 (03) :275-293
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1993, Fractal Space-Time and Microphysics
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Fractal Geometry: Mathematical Foundations and Applications, DOI DOI 10.1002/0470013850
[6]  
Appleby S, 1996, GEOGR ANAL, V28, P147
[7]  
Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2011, 1216 0 AUSTR STAND G
[8]  
Bian L, 1999, PHOTOGRAMM ENG REM S, V65, P73
[9]   SCALE DEPENDENCIES OF VEGETATION AND TOPOGRAPHY IN A MOUNTAINOUS ENVIRONMENT OF MONTANA [J].
BIAN, L ;
WALSH, SJ .
PROFESSIONAL GEOGRAPHER, 1993, 45 (01) :1-11
[10]   The fractal nature of nature: power laws, ecological complexity and biodiversity [J].
Brown, JH ;
Gupta, VK ;
Li, BL ;
Milne, BT ;
Restrepo, C ;
West, GB .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2002, 357 (1421) :619-626