Terminology of the branches of the lateral circumflex femoral artery: Who is Who?

被引:1
作者
Palackic, Alen [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Skias, Christoph [1 ,4 ]
Winter, Raimund [3 ]
Hubmer, Martin [3 ]
Andrianakis, Alexandros [1 ,5 ]
Feigl, Georg [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Graz, Gottfried Schatz Res Ctr Cell Signaling Metab & A, Div Macroscop & Clin Anat, Graz, Austria
[2] Univ Texas Med Branch, Dept Surg, Galveston, TX 77555 USA
[3] Med Univ Graz, Dept Surg, Div Plast Aesthet & Reconstruct Surg, Graz, Austria
[4] Elisabethinen Hosp Graz, Dept Surg, Graz, Austria
[5] Med Univ Graz, Dept Ear Nose & Throat, Graz, Austria
[6] Witten Herdecke Univ, Sch Med, Fac Hlth, Inst Anat & Clin Morphol, Alfred Herrhausen Str 50, D-58448 Witten, Germany
关键词
ALT flap; anatomy; lateral circumflex femoral artery; nomenclature; TFL flap; ANTEROLATERAL THIGH FLAP; COMPLETE CADAVERS; VASCULAR ANATOMY; PRESERVATION; DEFECTS; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1111/joa.13507
中图分类号
R602 [外科病理学、解剖学]; R32 [人体形态学];
学科分类号
100101 ;
摘要
The anterolateral thigh flap and the tensor fasciae latae flap are supplied by the lateral circumflex femoral artery (LCFA). Different branching patterns of the LCFA have been described, leading to confusion, discrepancies and difficulties in clinical and cadaveric study comparisons. The aim of this study was to evaluate the branching patterns of the LCFA in dissected lower limbs and propose a simplified nomenclature. One hundred and two lower limbs fixed with Thiel's method were investigated. Meticulous dissection was performed, and the branching pattern of the arteries was documented by illustration and photography. These were analysed and allocated to the currently existing terminologies regarding the numbers of the branches (Part 1), and these subgroups were evaluated according to the variability of the trunk formations (Part 2). In Part 1, four subgroups could be classified (A, B, C and D). Group A included a total number of three branches (n = 50), Group B included four (n = 41), Group C included five (n = 5) and Group D included only two branches (n = 6). Part 2 showed in total 11 different trunk variations. Group A had four trunk variations: A1 (n = 38), A2 (n = 5), A3 (n = 2) and A4 (n = 6); Group B also had four variations: B1 (n = 16), B2 (n = 18), B3 (n = 3) and B4 (n = 4); Group C displayed two variations: C1 (n = 1) and C2 (n = 4); and in Group D, there was only one variation observed D1 (n = 6). Branching patterns were highly variable and inconsistent in terms of the number of branches and trunk variations, which resulted in different possible and justified interpretations and classifications. A new terminology should be defined cooperatively among anatomists and clinicians that will be useful for everybody. We propose a terminology oriented to the associated muscles.
引用
收藏
页码:1465 / 1472
页数:8
相关论文
empty
未找到相关数据