A critical review of discursive approaches in energy transitions

被引:69
作者
Isoaho, Karoliina [1 ]
Karhunmaa, Kamilla [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Environm Policy Res Grp, Dept Social Res, POB 54, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
Qualitative methodology; Literature review; Discourse; Energy policy; Sustainability transitions; Socio-technical change; SUSTAINABILITY TRANSITIONS; NUCLEAR-POWER; SOCIOTECHNICAL TRANSITIONS; PUBLIC-OPINION; CLIMATE-CHANGE; DISCOURSE; POLICY; POLITICS; ELECTRICITY; DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2019.01.043
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This article critically reviews the use of discursive approaches in studies of sustainable energy transitions. The review is motivated by calls to further incorporate social scientific methodologies into energy research and assess their contribution to policy. We strive to answer three questions: (1) which discursive approaches have been used to study sustainable energy transitions; (2) what thematic topics and issue areas have been covered and (3) what is the added value of discursive research designs? Our analysis is based on a review of 77 articles from the years 2004-2016. Our findings show that discursive approaches were mostly used to analyse institutional change and policy strategies at the national level and to examine energy choices through political ideology and the perceptions of publics. Nuclear power received most coverage, while renewable energy technologies were mainly studied through conflicts and opposition. We demonstrate discursive research designs to examine four distinct policy areas and discuss the added value of these approaches for energy policy and research. Discursive methodologies enable scholars to enrich policy discussions through accounting for transitions as complex and dynamic processes of change.
引用
收藏
页码:930 / 942
页数:13
相关论文
共 104 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2005, POLITICS EARTH ENV D
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2009, Nudge
  • [3] Untitled
    Asdal, Kristin
    Marres, Noortje
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A-ECONOMY AND SPACE, 2014, 46 (09): : 2055 - 2064
  • [4] Asdal Kristin., 2015, Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal Of Social Theory, V16, P74, DOI [DOI 10.1080/1600910X.2015.1022194, 10.1080/1600910X.2015.1022194]
  • [5] The politics of sustainability transitions
    Avelino, Flor
    Grin, John
    Pel, Bonno
    Jhagroe, Shivant
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY & PLANNING, 2016, 18 (05) : 557 - 567
  • [6] Cool rationalities and hot air: A rhetorical approach to understanding debates on renewable energy
    Barry, John
    Ellis, Geraint
    Robinson, Clive
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2008, 8 (02) : 67 - +
  • [7] Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment
    Benford, RD
    Snow, DA
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF SOCIOLOGY, 2000, 26 : 611 - 639
  • [8] . Discursive regime dynamics in the Dutch energy transition
    Bosman, Rick
    Loorbach, Derk
    Frantzeskaki, Niki
    Pistorius, Till
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION AND SOCIETAL TRANSITIONS, 2014, 13 : 45 - 59
  • [9] Identifying and explaining framing strategies of low carbon lifestyle movement organisations
    Buechs, Milena
    Saunders, Clare
    Wallbridge, Rebecca
    Smith, Graham
    Bardsley, Nicholas
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2015, 35 : 307 - 315
  • [10] Public values for energy futures: Framing, indeterminacy and policy making
    Butler, C.
    Demski, C.
    Parkhill, K.
    Pidgeon, N.
    Spence, A.
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2015, 87 : 665 - 672