Contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast-CT: Analysis of optimal acquisition time for discrimination of breast lesion malignancy

被引:24
作者
Uhlig, Johannes [1 ]
Fischer, Uwe [2 ]
Surov, Alexey [3 ]
Lotz, Joachim [1 ]
Wienbeck, Susanne [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Gottingen, Inst Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, Robert Koch Str 40, Gottingen, Germany
[2] Diagnost Breast Ctr Gottingen, Bahnhofsallee 1d, D-37081 Gottingen, Germany
[3] Univ Leipzig, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, Liebigstr 20, Leipzig, Germany
关键词
Cone-beam breast-CT; Mammography; Breast cancer; Contrast media; Kinetics; CARCINOMA IN-SITU; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY; CANCER; DENSITY; MASSES; DIFFERENTIATION; ANGIOGENESIS; ULTRASOUND; CURVES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.12.003
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: To investigate the optimal acquisition time of contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast-CT (CBBCT) for best discrimination of breast lesion malignancy and whether contrast enhancement can aid in classification of tumor histology. Material and methods: The study included patients with BI-RADS 4 or 5 lesions identified on mammography and/or ultrasound. All patients were examined by non-contrast (NC-CBBCT) and contrast-enhanced CBBCT (CE-CBBCT) at 2 and 3 min after contrast media (CM) injection. Lesion enhancement of suspicious breast lesions was evaluated in corresponding CBBCT slices. Results: A total of 31 patients with 57 breast lesions, 30 malignant and 27 benign, were included. Malignant breast lesions demonstrated higher contrast enhancement than benign breast lesions at both 2 min and 3 min CE-CBBCT (2 min: 48.17 vs. 0.3 HU, p < 0.001; 3 min: 57.38 vs. 15.43 HU, p < 0.001). Enhancement differences between malignant and benign breast lesions were largest at 2 min CE-CBBCT. Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) showed highest mean contrast enhancement among malignant breast lesions (100.93 HU at 3 min CE-CBBCT, p = 0.0314) compared to invasive carcinoma of no special type with DCIS component (55.82 HU at 3 min CE-CBBCT) and invasive ductal carcinoma (52.31 HU at 3 min CE-CBBCT). Conclusions: The contrast enhancement on CE-CBBCT best discriminates between malignant and benign breast lesions at 2 min after CM injection. The enhancement has the potential to differentiate histopathological subtypes, with highest enhancement among malignant lesions seen for DCIS.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 16
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cone-beam volume CT breast imaging: Feasibility study
    Chen, B
    Ning, R
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2002, 29 (05) : 755 - 770
  • [32] A prototype system of upright dedicated cone-beam breast CT
    Xu, Gongming
    Fang, Chengyijue
    Jiang, Xiao
    Zhu, Lei
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2020: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2020, 11312
  • [33] Dedicated cone-beam breast CT: Data acquisition strategies based on projection angle-dependent normalized glandular dose coefficients
    Tseng, Hsin Wu
    Karellas, Andrew
    Vedantham, Srinivasan
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 50 (03) : 1406 - 1417
  • [34] A computer simulation study comparing lesion detection accuracy with digital mammography, breast tomosynthesis, and cone-beam CT breast imaging
    Gong, X
    Glick, SJ
    Liu, B
    Vedula, AA
    Thacker, S
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (04) : 1041 - 1052
  • [35] Noise power properties of a cone-beam CT system for breast cancer detection
    Yang, Kai
    Kwan, Alexander L. C.
    Huang, Shih-Ying
    Packard, Nathan J.
    Boone, John M.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (12) : 5317 - 5327
  • [36] Improving the spatial resolution characteristics of dedicated cone-beam breast CT technology
    Gazi, Peymon
    Boone, John M.
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2014: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2014, 9033
  • [37] Radiation dosimetry of a clinical prototype dedicated cone-beam breast CT system with offset detector
    Tseng, Hsin Wu
    Karellas, Andrew
    Vedantham, Srinivasan
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (03) : 1079 - 1088
  • [38] Cone-beam CT breast imaging with a flat panel detector - a simulation study
    Chen, LY
    Shaw, CC
    Tu, SJ
    Altunbas, M
    Wang, T
    Lai, CJ
    Liu, XM
    Kappadath, SC
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2005: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, PTS 1 AND 2, 2005, 5745 : 943 - 951
  • [39] The Frequency and Causes of Not-Detected Breast Malignancy in Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI
    Song, Donghun
    Kang, Bong Joo
    Kim, Sung Hun
    Lee, Jeongmin
    Park, Ga Eun
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2022, 12 (11)
  • [40] Angiography with cone-beam CT versus contrast-enhanced MRI for living donor transplant imaging: Is MRI enough?
    Ali, Hamza
    Weinstein, Jeffrey
    Sarwar, Ammar
    Evenson, Amy
    Raven, Kristin
    Curry, Michael P.
    Ahmed, Muneeb
    CLINICAL ANATOMY, 2024, 37 (02) : 185 - 192