Contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast-CT: Analysis of optimal acquisition time for discrimination of breast lesion malignancy

被引:24
|
作者
Uhlig, Johannes [1 ]
Fischer, Uwe [2 ]
Surov, Alexey [3 ]
Lotz, Joachim [1 ]
Wienbeck, Susanne [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Gottingen, Inst Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, Robert Koch Str 40, Gottingen, Germany
[2] Diagnost Breast Ctr Gottingen, Bahnhofsallee 1d, D-37081 Gottingen, Germany
[3] Univ Leipzig, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, Liebigstr 20, Leipzig, Germany
关键词
Cone-beam breast-CT; Mammography; Breast cancer; Contrast media; Kinetics; CARCINOMA IN-SITU; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY; CANCER; DENSITY; MASSES; DIFFERENTIATION; ANGIOGENESIS; ULTRASOUND; CURVES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.12.003
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: To investigate the optimal acquisition time of contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast-CT (CBBCT) for best discrimination of breast lesion malignancy and whether contrast enhancement can aid in classification of tumor histology. Material and methods: The study included patients with BI-RADS 4 or 5 lesions identified on mammography and/or ultrasound. All patients were examined by non-contrast (NC-CBBCT) and contrast-enhanced CBBCT (CE-CBBCT) at 2 and 3 min after contrast media (CM) injection. Lesion enhancement of suspicious breast lesions was evaluated in corresponding CBBCT slices. Results: A total of 31 patients with 57 breast lesions, 30 malignant and 27 benign, were included. Malignant breast lesions demonstrated higher contrast enhancement than benign breast lesions at both 2 min and 3 min CE-CBBCT (2 min: 48.17 vs. 0.3 HU, p < 0.001; 3 min: 57.38 vs. 15.43 HU, p < 0.001). Enhancement differences between malignant and benign breast lesions were largest at 2 min CE-CBBCT. Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) showed highest mean contrast enhancement among malignant breast lesions (100.93 HU at 3 min CE-CBBCT, p = 0.0314) compared to invasive carcinoma of no special type with DCIS component (55.82 HU at 3 min CE-CBBCT) and invasive ductal carcinoma (52.31 HU at 3 min CE-CBBCT). Conclusions: The contrast enhancement on CE-CBBCT best discriminates between malignant and benign breast lesions at 2 min after CM injection. The enhancement has the potential to differentiate histopathological subtypes, with highest enhancement among malignant lesions seen for DCIS.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 16
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A novel hardware duo of beam modulation and shielding to reduce scatter acquisition and dose in cone-beam breast CT
    Ghazi, Peymon
    Youssefian, Sina
    Ghazi, Tara
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (01) : 169 - 185
  • [22] Cone-Beam Breast Computed Tomography: Time for a New Paradigm in Breast Imaging
    O'Connell, Avice M.
    Marini, Thomas J.
    Kawakyu-O'Connor, Daniel T.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (21)
  • [23] Editorial comment: cone-beam and phase contrast CT: new horizons in breast imaging?
    Boss, Andreas
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2018, 28 (09) : 3729 - 3730
  • [24] An in vitro evaluation of cone-beam breast CT methods
    Zeng, Kai
    Fajardo, Laurie L.
    Kao, Simon
    Franken, Edmund A.
    Park, Jeong Mi
    Jing, Zhenxue
    Bai, Er-wei
    Wang, Ge
    JOURNAL OF X-RAY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 16 (03) : 171 - 187
  • [25] Spectra Optimization for Dual-Energy Contrast-Enhanced Breast CT
    de Carvalho, Pablo Milioni
    Carton, Ann-Katherine
    Saab-Puong, Sylvie
    Iordache, Razvan
    Muller, Serge
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2013: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2013, 8668
  • [26] Review of clinical studies and first clinical experiences with a commercially available cone-beam breast CT in Europe
    Wienbeck, Susanne
    Lotz, Joachim
    Fischer, Uwe
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2017, 42 : 50 - 59
  • [27] Perfusion curve f (t) analysis of breast cancer by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography
    Guo, Liang
    Liu, Zhi-Gang
    Han, Pei-Hua
    Yuan, Quan
    He, Yu
    Li, Jun
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2012, 53 (09) : 981 - 986
  • [28] A head-to-head comparison of breast lesion's conspicuity at contrast-enhanced mammography and contrast-enhanced MRI
    Santonocito, Ambra
    Zarcaro, Calogero
    Zeitouni, Layla
    Ferrara, Francesca
    Kapetas, Panagiotis
    Helbich, Thomas H.
    Clauser, Paola
    Baltzer, Pascal A. T.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2024, : 3070 - 3079
  • [29] Comparison of contrast-enhanced digital mammography and contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis for lesion assessment Comparison of contrast-enhanced
    Huang, Hailiang
    Scaduto, David A.
    Liu, Chunling
    Yang, Jie
    Zhu, Chencan
    Rinaldi, Kim
    Eisenberg, Jason
    Liu, Jingxuan
    Hoernig, Mathias
    Wicklein, Julia
    Vogt, Sebastian
    Mertelmeier, Thomas
    Fisher, Paul R.
    Zhao, Wei
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2019, 6 (03)
  • [30] Predicting Malignancy of Breast Imaging Findings Using Quantitative Analysis of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography (CEM)
    Miller, Matthew M.
    Rubaiyat, Abu Hasnat Mohammad
    Rohde, Gustavo K.
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 13 (06)