Dexmedetomidine vs midazolam as preanesthetic medication in children: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

被引:65
|
作者
Pasin, Laura [1 ]
Febres, Daniela [1 ]
Testa, Valentina [1 ]
Frati, Elena [1 ]
Borghi, Giovanni [1 ]
Landoni, Giovanni [1 ,2 ]
Zangrillo, Alberto [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] IRCCS San Raffaele Sci Inst, Dept Anaesthesia & Intens Care, Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Vita Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
关键词
anesthesia-pediatric; dexmedetomidine; meta-analysis; midazolam; premedication; children; INTRANASAL DEXMEDETOMIDINE; ORAL MIDAZOLAM; PREMEDICATION; PREVENTION; ANESTHESIA; INDUCTION; CLONIDINE; SUPERIOR; ANXIETY;
D O I
10.1111/pan.12587
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
IntroductionThe preoperative period is a stressing occurrence for most people undergoing surgery, in particular children. Approximately 50-75% of children undergoing surgery develop anxiety which is associated with distress on emergence from anesthesia and with later postoperative behavioral problems. Premedication, commonly performed with benzodiazepines, reduces preoperative anxiety, facilitates separation from parents, and promotes acceptance of mask induction. Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective (2)-agonist with sedative and analgesic properties. A meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on dexmedetomidine versus midazolam was performed to evaluate its efficacy in improving perioperative sedation and analgesia, and in reducing postoperative agitation when used as a preanesthetic medication in children. MethodsStudies were independently searched in PubMed, BioMedCentral, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of clinical trials and updated on August 15th, 2014. Primary outcomes were represented by improved sedation at separation from parents, at induction of anesthesia, and reduction in postoperative agitation. Secondary outcomes were reduction in rescue analgesic drugs, and duration of surgery and anesthesia. Inclusion criteria were random allocation to treatment and comparison between dexmedetomidine and midazolam. Exclusion criteria were adult studies, duplicate publications, intravenous administration, and no data on main outcomes. ResultsData from 1033 children in 13 randomized trials were analyzed. Overall, in the dexmedetomidine group there was a higher incidence of satisfactory sedation at separation from parents (314 of 424 [74%] in the dexmedetomidine group vs 196 of 391 [50%] in the midazolam group, RR=1.30 [1.05-1.62], P=0.02), a reduced incidence of postoperative agitation (14 of 140 [10%] vs 56 of 141 [40%], RR=0.31 [0.13-0.73], P=0.008), and a significant reduction in the rescue doses of analgesic drugs (49 of 241 [20%] vs 95 of 243 [39%], RR=0.52 [0.39-0.70], P<0.001). There was no evidence of a higher incidence of satisfactory sedation at anesthesia induction or any reduction of duration of surgery and anesthesia. ConclusionsDexmedetomidine is effective in decreasing anxiety upon separation from parents, decreasing postoperative agitation, and providing more effective postoperative analgesia when compared with midazolam.
引用
收藏
页码:468 / 476
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of single minimum dose administration of dexmedetomidine and midazolam for prevention of emergence delirium in children: a randomized controlled trial
    Cho, Eun-Ah
    Cha, Yun-Byeong
    Shim, Jae-Geum
    Ahn, Jin-Hee
    Lee, Sung Hyun
    Ryu, Kyoung-Ho
    JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA, 2020, 34 (01) : 59 - 65
  • [42] Efficacy and Safety of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine During Recovery From Sevoflurane Anesthesia in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Xu, Chengfeng
    Zhang, Yanyuan
    Zhang, Taomei
    Wu, Duozhi
    Zhang, Kexian
    CLINICAL NEUROPHARMACOLOGY, 2021, 44 (05) : 157 - 168
  • [43] Intravenous dexmedetomidine versus tramadol for treatment of shivering after spinal anesthesia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Wang, Jinguo
    Wang, Zaitang
    Liu, Junyan
    Wang, Na
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [44] Systematic assessment of dexmedetomidine as an anesthetic agent: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Piao, Guanying
    Wu, Jiarui
    ARCHIVES OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2014, 10 (01) : 19 - 24
  • [45] Caudal dexmedetomidine in pediatric caudal anesthesia A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Wang, Xian-xue
    Dai, Jing
    Dai, Li
    Guo, Hua-jing
    Zhou, Ai-guo
    Pan, Dao-bo
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (31)
  • [46] The effectiveness of distraction as preoperative anxiety management technique in pediatric patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Wu, JiaXin
    Yan, JingXin
    Zhang, LanXin
    Chen, Jiao
    Cheng, Yi
    Wang, YaXuan
    Zhu, MeiLin
    Cheng, Li
    Zhang, LuShun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2022, 130
  • [47] Safety and efficacy of dexmedetomidine vs. midazolam in complex gastrointestinal endoscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liu, Wei
    Ge, Xiaoyan
    Gao, Fang
    Kan, Qingfang
    Wang, Shaohua
    Wang, Yikai
    He, Chuan
    CLINICS AND RESEARCH IN HEPATOLOGY AND GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2024, 48 (04)
  • [48] Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the efficacy of dexmedetomidine to midazolam as premedication and a sedative agent in pediatric patients undergoing dental procedures
    Taneja, Saumya
    Jain, Anuj
    ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY-HEIDELBERG, 2023, 27 (04): : 547 - 557
  • [49] The Effect of Dexmedetomidine on the Prognosis of Mechanically Ventilated Patients with Sepsis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Yuan, Jing
    Lu, Sheng-Fang
    Xu, Ping
    Niu, Yan-Li
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 51 (10) : 2171 - 2180
  • [50] Oral Dexmedetomidine Achieves Superior Effects in Mitigating Emergence Agitation and Demonstrates Comparable Sedative Effects to Oral Midazolam for Pediatric Premedication: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies
    Jen, Chun-Kai
    Lu, Kuo-Ching
    Chen, Kuan-Wen
    Lu, Yun-Ru
    Huang, I-Tao
    Huang, Yu-Chen
    Huang, Chun-Jen
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (04)