Dexmedetomidine vs midazolam as preanesthetic medication in children: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

被引:65
|
作者
Pasin, Laura [1 ]
Febres, Daniela [1 ]
Testa, Valentina [1 ]
Frati, Elena [1 ]
Borghi, Giovanni [1 ]
Landoni, Giovanni [1 ,2 ]
Zangrillo, Alberto [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] IRCCS San Raffaele Sci Inst, Dept Anaesthesia & Intens Care, Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Vita Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
关键词
anesthesia-pediatric; dexmedetomidine; meta-analysis; midazolam; premedication; children; INTRANASAL DEXMEDETOMIDINE; ORAL MIDAZOLAM; PREMEDICATION; PREVENTION; ANESTHESIA; INDUCTION; CLONIDINE; SUPERIOR; ANXIETY;
D O I
10.1111/pan.12587
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
IntroductionThe preoperative period is a stressing occurrence for most people undergoing surgery, in particular children. Approximately 50-75% of children undergoing surgery develop anxiety which is associated with distress on emergence from anesthesia and with later postoperative behavioral problems. Premedication, commonly performed with benzodiazepines, reduces preoperative anxiety, facilitates separation from parents, and promotes acceptance of mask induction. Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective (2)-agonist with sedative and analgesic properties. A meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on dexmedetomidine versus midazolam was performed to evaluate its efficacy in improving perioperative sedation and analgesia, and in reducing postoperative agitation when used as a preanesthetic medication in children. MethodsStudies were independently searched in PubMed, BioMedCentral, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of clinical trials and updated on August 15th, 2014. Primary outcomes were represented by improved sedation at separation from parents, at induction of anesthesia, and reduction in postoperative agitation. Secondary outcomes were reduction in rescue analgesic drugs, and duration of surgery and anesthesia. Inclusion criteria were random allocation to treatment and comparison between dexmedetomidine and midazolam. Exclusion criteria were adult studies, duplicate publications, intravenous administration, and no data on main outcomes. ResultsData from 1033 children in 13 randomized trials were analyzed. Overall, in the dexmedetomidine group there was a higher incidence of satisfactory sedation at separation from parents (314 of 424 [74%] in the dexmedetomidine group vs 196 of 391 [50%] in the midazolam group, RR=1.30 [1.05-1.62], P=0.02), a reduced incidence of postoperative agitation (14 of 140 [10%] vs 56 of 141 [40%], RR=0.31 [0.13-0.73], P=0.008), and a significant reduction in the rescue doses of analgesic drugs (49 of 241 [20%] vs 95 of 243 [39%], RR=0.52 [0.39-0.70], P<0.001). There was no evidence of a higher incidence of satisfactory sedation at anesthesia induction or any reduction of duration of surgery and anesthesia. ConclusionsDexmedetomidine is effective in decreasing anxiety upon separation from parents, decreasing postoperative agitation, and providing more effective postoperative analgesia when compared with midazolam.
引用
收藏
页码:468 / 476
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Differences in efficacy and safety of midazolam vs. dexmedetomidine in critically ill patients: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial
    Zhou, Wen-Jun
    Liu, Mei
    Fan, Xue-Peng
    EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE, 2021, 21 (02)
  • [22] Dexmedetomidine versus other sedatives for non-painful pediatric examinations: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Lin, Yiquan
    Zhang, Rui
    Shen, Weihua
    Chen, Qianru
    Zhu, Yanling
    Li, Jinfei
    Chi, Wei
    Gan, Xiaoliang
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2020, 62
  • [23] Oral preanesthetic medication in children --comparison between midazolam alone and in combination with ketamine: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    de Oliveira Filho, Getulio Rodrigues
    Castilhos, Carlos Maestri
    Kriegl, Jean Philippe
    Bianchi, Giulia Nonticuri
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2023, 73 (04): : 477 - 490
  • [24] An evaluation of dexmedetomidine in combination with midazolam in pediatric sedation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Nie, Juan
    Li, Chenxi
    Yang, Ge
    Chang, Huihui
    Ding, Guicong
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2024, 24 (01):
  • [25] Dexmedetomidine versus midazolam for sedation during endoscopy: A meta-analysis
    Zhang, Fan
    Sun, Hao-Rui
    Zheng, Ze-Bing
    Liao, Ren
    Liu, Jin
    EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE, 2016, 11 (06) : 2519 - 2524
  • [26] Efficacy of dexmedetomidine on postoperative nausea and vomiting: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Liang, Xiao
    Zhou, Miao
    Feng, Jiao-Jiao
    Wu, Liang
    Fang, Shang-Ping
    Ge, Xin-Yu
    Sun, Hai-Jing
    Ren, Peng-Cheng
    Lv, Xin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2015, 8 (06): : 8450 - 8471
  • [27] Effect of dexmedetomidine on preventing perioperative respiratory adverse events in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Zhang, Junli
    Yin, Jing
    Li, Yuanyuan
    Zhang, Yu
    Bai, Yaowu
    Yang, Hongyuan
    EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE, 2023, 25 (06)
  • [28] A comprehensive evaluation between dexmedetomidine and midazolam for intraoperative sedation in the elderly: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Chunxia Huang
    Zunjiang Li
    Yingxin Long
    Dongli Li
    Manhua Huang
    Banghan Ding
    Wei Zhu
    Systematic Reviews, 11
  • [29] Efficacy of dexmedetomidine for treatment of patients with sepsis A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Zhang, Wen-Qing
    Xu, Po
    Zhan, Xiao-Hong
    Zheng, Peng
    Yang, Wei
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (18)
  • [30] The effect of intranasal dexmedetomidine administration on emergence agitation or delirium in pediatric patients after general anesthesia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Na, Hyo-Seok
    Kim, Su Yeon
    Park, Ji In
    Lee, Sohyun
    Hwang, Jung-Won
    Shin, Hyun-Jung
    PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2023, 33 (08) : 636 - 646