The Development of a Preference-Setting Model for the Return of Individual Genomic Research Results

被引:20
作者
Bacon, Phoebe L. [1 ]
Harris, Erin D. [2 ]
Ziniel, Sonja I. [3 ,4 ]
Savage, Sarah K. [4 ]
Weitzman, Elissa R. [3 ,4 ]
Green, Robert C. [3 ,5 ]
Huntington, Noelle L. [3 ,4 ]
Holm, Ingrid A. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[2] Northeastern Univ, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
[4] Boston Childrens Hosp, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[5] Partners Personalized Med, Boston, MA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
pediatrics; genomic research; individual research results; participant preferences; biobank; return of results; cognitive interviews; qualitative research; MANAGING INCIDENTAL FINDINGS; GENETIC RISK-ASSESSMENT; ALZHEIMER-DISEASE; RECOMMENDATIONS; INFORMATION; UTILITY; PARTICIPANTS; DISCLOSURE; GUIDELINES; MEDICINE;
D O I
10.1177/1556264615572092
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Understanding participants' preferences for the return of individual research results (IRR) in genomic research may allow for the implementation of more beneficial result disclosure methods. We tested four preference-setting models through cognitive interviews of parents to explore how parents conceptualize the process of setting preferences and which disease characteristics they believe to be most important when deciding what results to receive on their child. Severity and preventability of a condition were highly influential in decision making and certain groups of research results were anticipated by participants to have negative psychological effects. These findings informed the development of an educational tool and preference-setting model that can be scaled for use in the return of IRR from large biobank studies.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 120
页数:14
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Return of incidental findings in genomic medicine: measuring what patients value-development of an instrument to measure preferences for information from next-generation testing (IMPRINT)
    Bennette, Caroline Savage
    Trinidad, Susan Brown
    Fullerton, Stephanie M.
    Patrick, Donald
    Amendola, Laura
    Burke, Wylie
    Hisama, Fuki M.
    Jarvik, Gail P.
    Regier, Dean A.
    Veenstra, David L.
    [J]. GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2013, 15 (11) : 873 - 881
  • [2] Deploying whole genome sequencing in clinical practice and public health: Meeting the challenge one bin at a time
    Berg, Jonathan S.
    Khoury, Muin J.
    Evans, James P.
    [J]. GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2011, 13 (06) : 499 - 504
  • [3] Public preferences regarding the return of individual genetic research results: findings from a qualitative focus group study
    Bollinger, Juli Murphy
    Scott, Joan
    Dvoskin, Rachel
    Kaufman, David
    [J]. GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2012, 14 (04) : 451 - 457
  • [4] Reporting genetic results in research studies: Summary and recommendations of an NHLBI working group
    Bookman, EB
    Langehorne, AA
    Eckfeldt, JH
    Glass, KC
    Jarvik, GP
    Klag, M
    Koski, G
    Motulsky, A
    Wilfond, B
    Manolio, TA
    Fabsitz, RR
    Luepker, RV
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A, 2006, 140A (10) : 1033 - 1040
  • [5] Health behavior changes after genetic risk assessment for Alzheimer disease: The REVEAL Study
    Chao, Serena
    Roberts, J. Scott
    Marteau, Theresa M.
    Silliman, Rebecca
    Cupples, L. Adrienne
    Green, Robert C.
    [J]. ALZHEIMER DISEASE & ASSOCIATED DISORDERS, 2008, 22 (01) : 94 - 97
  • [6] Ethical and Practical Guidelines for Reporting Genetic Research Results to Study Participants Updated Guidelines From a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Working Group
    Fabsitz, Richard R.
    McGuire, Amy
    Sharp, Richard R.
    Puggal, Mona
    Beskow, Laura M.
    Biesecker, Leslie G.
    Bookman, Ebony
    Burke, Wylie
    Burchard, Esteban Gonzalez
    Church, George
    Clayton, Ellen Wright
    Eckfeldt, John H.
    Fernandez, Conrad V.
    Fisher, Rebecca
    Fullerton, Stephanie M.
    Gabriel, Stacey
    Gachupin, Francine
    James, Cynthia
    Jarvik, Gail P.
    Kittles, Rick
    Leib, Jennifer R.
    O'Donnell, Christopher
    O'Rourke, P. Pearl
    Rodriguez, Laura Lyman
    Schully, Sheri D.
    Shuldiner, Alan R.
    Sze, Rebecca K. F.
    Thakuria, Joseph V.
    Wolf, Susan M.
    Burke, Gregory L.
    [J]. CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR GENETICS, 2010, 3 (06) : 574 - 580
  • [7] Evaluating the utility of personal genomic information
    Foster, Morris W.
    Mulvihill, John J.
    Sharp, Richard R.
    [J]. GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2009, 11 (08) : 570 - 574
  • [8] Glaser BG., 1967, DISCOV GROUNDED THEO, DOI DOI 10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014
  • [9] Genetic susceptibility testing for Alzheimer disease: Motivation to obtain information and control as precursors to coping with increased risk
    Gooding, Holly C.
    Linnenbringer, Erin L.
    Burack, Jeffrey
    Roberts, J. Scott
    Green, Robert C.
    Biesecker, Barbara B.
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2006, 64 (1-3) : 259 - 267
  • [10] ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing
    Green, Robert C.
    Berg, Jonathan S.
    Grody, Wayne W.
    Kalia, Sarah S.
    Korf, Bruce R.
    Martin, Christa L.
    McGuire, Amy L.
    Nussbaum, Robert L.
    O'Daniel, Julianne M.
    Ormond, Kelly E.
    Rehm, Heidi L.
    Watson, Michael S.
    Williams, Marc S.
    Biesecker, Leslie G.
    [J]. GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2013, 15 (07) : 565 - 574