A DEA-based approach for allocation of emission reduction tasks

被引:34
作者
Wu, Jie [1 ]
Zhu, Qingyuan [1 ]
Chu, Junfei [1 ]
An, Qingxian [2 ]
Liang, Liang [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sci & Technol China, Sch Management, Hefei, Peoples R China
[2] Cent S Univ, Sch Business, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
[3] Hefei Univ Technol, Sch Management, Hefei, Peoples R China
基金
高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金;
关键词
data envelopment analysis; game theory; environment; decision theory; emission permits; satisfaction degree; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; RESOURCE-ALLOCATION; CO2; EMISSIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL-PROTECTION; SHARED COSTS; FIXED COST; PERMITS; EFFICIENCY; TECHNOLOGY; INCENTIVES;
D O I
10.1080/00207543.2016.1194537
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Rapid economic growth has led to increasing pollution emission, leading governments to require emission reductions by specific amounts. The allocation of specific emission reduction tasks has become a significant issue and has drawn the attention of academia. Data envelopment analysis (DEA) has been extended to construct the allocation of emission reduction tasks model. These previous DEA-based approaches have strong assumptions about individual enterprise production. In this paper, we propose a new method to accurately assess the production, using each enterprise's previously observed production to construct its own production technology plan. With emission permits decreased, the enterprise can have new production strategy based on its own technology. Assuming emission permits can be freely bought and sold, we show how each enterprise can determine the optimal amount of emission allowance that should be used for production, which may leave some allowance to be sold for extra profit or may require the purchase of permits from other firms. Considering the limitation on the total allowance from emission permits, we introduce the concept of satisfaction degree and use it in maximising the minimum enterprise satisfaction degree. Last, a numerical example is presented and an empirical application is given to verify the proposed approach.
引用
收藏
页码:5618 / 5633
页数:16
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
ACKERMAN F, 1997, ELECT J, V10, P61, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1040-6190(97)80472-1
[2]   A Ten-Year Rule to guide the allocation of EU emission allowances [J].
Ahman, Markus ;
Burtraw, Dallas ;
Kruger, Joseph ;
Zetterberg, Lars .
ENERGY POLICY, 2007, 35 (03) :1718-1730
[3]   Allocating fixed costs and target setting: A dea-based approach [J].
Amirteimoori, A ;
Kordrostami, S .
APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTATION, 2005, 171 (01) :136-151
[4]   Internal resource waste and centralization degree in two-stage systems: An efficiency analysis [J].
An, Qingxian ;
Yan, Hong ;
Wu, Jie ;
Liang, Liang .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2016, 61 :89-99
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2001, 0130 RES FUT
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2006, 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme, P4
[7]   SOME MODELS FOR ESTIMATING TECHNICAL AND SCALE INEFFICIENCIES IN DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS [J].
BANKER, RD ;
CHARNES, A ;
COOPER, WW .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1984, 30 (09) :1078-1092
[8]   Resource allocation and target setting for parallel production system based on DEA [J].
Bi, Gongbing ;
Ding, Jingjing ;
Luo, Yan ;
Liang, Liang .
APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2011, 35 (09) :4270-4280
[9]   On the design of optimal grandfathering schemes for emission allowances [J].
Böhringer, C ;
Lange, A .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2005, 49 (08) :2041-2055
[10]   Transactions costs in tradable permit markets: An experimental study of pollution market designs [J].
Cason, TN ;
Gangadharan, L .
JOURNAL OF REGULATORY ECONOMICS, 2003, 23 (02) :145-165