Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Modular Femoral Implant in Paprosky Type III and IV Femoral Bone Loss

被引:18
作者
Desai, Rasesh R. [1 ]
Malkani, Arthur L. [1 ]
Hitt, Kirby D. [2 ]
Jaffe, Fredrick F. [4 ]
Schurman, John R., II [3 ]
Shen, Jianhua [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Louisville, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Louisville, KY 40202 USA
[2] Scott & White Mem Hosp & Clin, Temple, TX USA
[3] Adv Orthoped Associates PA, Wichita, KS USA
[4] NYU, Hosp Joint Dis, New York, NY USA
[5] Stryker Orthopaed, Mahwah, NJ USA
关键词
revision THA; Paprosky type III and IV defect; modular femoral stem; 5-YEAR FOLLOW-UP; COMPONENT; STEMS; FIXATION; RECONSTRUCTION; REPLACEMENT; PROSTHESIS; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2012.03.039
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of this study was to compare results of patients with Paprosky type I and II femoral defects vs type IIIA, IIIB, and IV defects in patients undergoing revision hip arthroplasty. There were 64 patients in the group with type I and II defects with an average age of 68 years. There were 52 patients with Paprosky type IIIA, IIIB, and IV defects with an average age of 67 years. There were 8 intraoperative fractures in the type III and IV group, whereas there were 9 in the type I and II group. There were no differences between the 2 groups with respect to subsidence, loosening, dislocation, infection, and medical complications. Survivorship for the whole group was 96.9% at 5 years. Modular femoral implants provide several intraoperative options to restore leg length, offset, and stability despite femoral defects. We did not realize a higher failure rate in patients with type III or IV defects.
引用
收藏
页码:1492 / 1498
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Proximal femoral allografts for reconstruction of bone stock in revision arthroplasty of the hip - A nine to fifteen-year follow up [J].
Blackley, HRL ;
Davis, AM ;
Hutchison, CR ;
Gross, AE .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2001, 83A (03) :346-354
[2]   RESULTS OF REVISION FOR MECHANICAL FAILURE AFTER CEMENTED TOTAL HIP-REPLACEMENT, 1979 TO 1982 - A 2 TO 5-YEAR FOLLOW-UP [J].
CALLAGHAN, JJ ;
SALVATI, EA ;
PELLICCI, PM ;
WILSON, PD ;
RANAWAT, CS .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1985, 67A (07) :1074-1085
[3]   The long-term success of modular proximal fixation stems in revision total hip arthroplasty [J].
Cameron, HU .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2002, 17 (04) :138-141
[4]   Clinical experience with a modular noncemented femoral component in revision total hip arthroplasty - 4-to 7-year results [J].
Christie, MJ ;
DeBoer, DK ;
Tingstad, EM ;
Capps, M ;
Brinson, MF ;
Trick, LW .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2000, 15 (07) :840-848
[5]  
Della Valle CJ, 2003, J BONE JOINT SURG AM, V85A, P1
[6]   Extensively porous-coated femoral revision for severe femoral bone loss - Minimum 10-year follow-up [J].
Engh, CA ;
Ellis, TJ ;
Koralewicz, LM ;
McAuley, JP ;
Engh, CA .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2002, 17 (08) :955-960
[7]   Improved outcome in femoral revision arthroplasty with tapered fluted modular titanium stems [J].
Garbuz, Donald S. ;
Toms, Andrew ;
Masri, Bassam A. ;
Duncan, Clive P. .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2006, (453) :199-202
[8]   Long-term results after cemented revision of the femoral component in total hip arthroplasty [J].
Gramkow, J ;
Jensen, TH ;
Varmarken, JE ;
Retpen, JB .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2001, 16 (06) :777-783
[9]   The Effect of Modular Tapered Fluted Stems on Proximal Stress Shielding in The Human Femur [J].
Hnat, William P. ;
Conway, Justin S. ;
Malkani, Arthur L. ;
Yakkanti, Madhu R. ;
Voor, Michael J. .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2009, 24 (06) :957-962
[10]   Impaction technique and graft treatment in revisions of the femoral component -: Laboratory studies and clinical validation [J].
Höstner, J ;
Hultmark, P ;
Kärrholm, J ;
Malchau, H ;
Tveit, M .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2001, 16 (01) :76-82