Evaluating the use of plerixafor in stem cell mobilisation - an economic analysis of the PHANTASTIC trial

被引:11
作者
Martin, Antony P. [1 ]
Richards, Sarah [1 ]
Haycox, Alan [1 ]
Houten, Rachel [1 ]
McLeod, Claire [1 ]
Braithwaite, Barbara [2 ]
Clark, Jack O. [2 ]
Bell, Joanne [2 ]
Clark, Richard E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Liverpool, Sch Management, Liverpool Hlth Econ, Dept Econ, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[2] Royal Liverpool Univ Hosp, Dept Haematol, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
关键词
stem cell mobilisation; stem cell transplantation; lymphoma; myeloma; haematology; MULTIPLE-MYELOMA EFFECTIVENESS; NON-HODGKINS-LYMPHOMA; PLUS G-CSF; AUTOLOGOUS TRANSPLANTATION; BLOOD; COST; STRATEGIES; ALGORITHM; EUROPE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1002/jca.21433
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Plerixafor is an effective haematopoietic stem cell mobilising agent in candidates for autologous transplantation, including patients with myeloma and lymphoma. Here we compare 98 plerixafor recipients in the PHANTASTIC trial with 151 historic controls mobilised by conventional chemotherapy (each with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, G-CSF). Seventy (71.4%) plerixafor-mobilised patients achieved the composite primary endpoint of 4 x 10(6) CD34+ cellskg(-1) in 2 aphereses and no clinically significant neutropenia, compared to 48 (31.8%) historic controls (P<0.001), and this significant advantage was maintained in scenario analyses testing components of this composite endpoint. A patient-level cost analysis was undertaken for 249 patients, which included the cost of remobilising patients where initial mobilisation had failed. Combined mean treatment cost for plerixafor mobilised patients was 12,679 pound compared with 11,694 pound for historical controls. However, plerixafor produces an average saving of 3,828 pound per lymphoma patient but average cost increase by 5,245 pound per myeloma patient. The present data demonstrate cost-effectiveness for plerixafor as a first line mobilisation agent, certainly for lymphoma patients, where substantial resource savings and achievement of the primary endpoint are likely. J. Clin. Apheresis 31:434-442, 2016. (c) 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:434 / 442
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   GCSF with or without chemotherapy compared to Plerixafor with GCSF as salvage mobilization regimen in patients with multiple myeloma and lymphoma: Collection effectiveness and cost effectiveness analysis [J].
Abdel-Rahman, Fawzi ;
Tuffaha, Haitham W. ;
Sharma, Shanta ;
Abu Jazar, Husam ;
Hussein, Nilly ;
Saad, Adnan ;
Al Rawi, Omar ;
Hussein, Ayad .
JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PHARMACY PRACTICE, 2014, 20 (02) :130-136
[2]   An algorithm for utilizing peripheral blood CD34 count as a predictor of the need for plerixafor in autologous stem cell mobilizationcost-effectiveness analysis [J].
Abusin, Ghada A. ;
Abu-Arja, Rolla F. ;
Gingrich, Roger D. ;
Silverman, Margarida D. ;
Zamba, Gideon K. D. ;
Schlueter, Annette J. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL APHERESIS, 2013, 28 (04) :293-300
[3]   Cost-Effectiveness of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization Strategies Including Plerixafor in Multiple Myeloma and Lymphoma Patients [J].
Ales, Tichopad ;
Veronika, Vitova ;
Zdenek, Koristek ;
Daniel, Lysak .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL APHERESIS, 2013, 28 (06) :395-403
[4]   G-CSF plus preemptive plerixafor vs hyperfractionated CY plus G-CSF for autologous stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma: effectiveness, safety and cost analysis [J].
Antar, A. ;
Otrock, Z. K. ;
Kharfan-Dabaja, M. A. ;
Ghaddara, H. A. ;
Kreidieh, N. ;
Mahfouz, R. ;
Bazarbachi, A. .
BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2015, 50 (06) :813-817
[5]   Plerixafor to rescue failing chemotherapy-based stem cell mobilization: it's not too late [J].
Basak, Grzegorz W. ;
Mikala, Gabor ;
Koristek, Zdenek ;
Jaksic, Ozren ;
Basic-Kinda, Sandra ;
Cegledi, Andrea ;
Reti, Marienn ;
Masszi, Tamas ;
Mayer, Jiri ;
Giebel, Sebastian ;
Huebel, Kai ;
Labar, Boris ;
Wiktor-Jedrzejczak, Wieslaw .
LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA, 2011, 52 (09) :1711-1719
[6]   Hematopoietic stem cell mobilization with the reversible CXCR4 receptor inhibitor plerixafor (AMD3100)-Polish compassionate use experience [J].
Basak, Grzegorz Wladyslaw ;
Knopinska-Posluszny, Wanda ;
Matuszak, Magdalena ;
Kisiel, Elzbieta ;
Hawrylecka, Dorota ;
Szmigielska-Kaplon, Anna ;
Urbaniak-Kujda, Donata ;
Dybko, Jaroslaw ;
Zielinska, Patrycja ;
Dabrowska-Iwanicka, Anna ;
Werkun, Joanna ;
Rzepecki, Piotr ;
Wroblewska, Wiktoria ;
Wiktor-Jedrzejczak, Wieslaw .
ANNALS OF HEMATOLOGY, 2011, 90 (05) :557-568
[7]   A Phase II Study of Plerixafor (AMD3100) plus G-CSF for Autologous Hematopoietic Progenitor Cell Mobilization in Patients with Hodgkin Lymphoma [J].
Cashen, Amanda ;
Lopez, Sandra ;
Gao, Feng ;
Calandra, Gary ;
MacFarland, Ron ;
Badel, Karin ;
DiPersio, John .
BIOLOGY OF BLOOD AND MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2008, 14 (11) :1253-1261
[8]   Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Mobilization in Multiple Myeloma Patients Treat in the Novel Therapy-Era With Plerixafor and G-CSF Has Superior Efficacy but Significantly Higher Costs Compared to Mobilization With Low-Dose Cyclophosphamide and G-CSF [J].
Chaudhary, Lubna ;
Awan, Farrukh ;
Cumpston, Aaron ;
Leadmon, Sonia ;
Watkins, Kathy ;
Tse, William ;
Craig, Michael ;
Hamadani, Mehdi .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL APHERESIS, 2013, 28 (05) :359-367
[9]   Plerixafor is superior to conventional chemotherapy for first-line stem cell mobilisation, and is effective even in heavily pretreated patients [J].
Clark, R. E. ;
Bell, J. ;
Clark, J. O. ;
Braithwaite, B. ;
Vithanarachchi, U. ;
McGinnity, N. ;
Callaghan, T. ;
Francis, S. ;
Salim, R. .
BLOOD CANCER JOURNAL, 2014, 4 :e255-e255
[10]   Late Afternoon Dosing of Plerixafor for Stem Cell Mobilization: A Practical Solution [J].
Cooper, Dennis L. ;
Pratt, Kathryn ;
Baker, Julie ;
Medoff, Erin ;
Conkling-Walsh, Ann ;
Foss, Francine ;
Snyder, Edward ;
Yen, Wu ;
Seropian, Stuart E. .
CLINICAL LYMPHOMA MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA, 2011, 11 (03) :267-272