Gender and Human Rights Within UNESCO's International Heritage Discourse: An Analysis of the World Heritage and Intangible Heritage Conventions

被引:0
作者
Whittington, Vanessa [1 ]
机构
[1] Western Sydney Univ, Inst Culture & Soc, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2752, Australia
关键词
Gender; women; human rights; world heritage; intangible cultural heritage; UNESCO; cultural heritage; discrimination; CULTURAL-DIVERSITY;
D O I
10.1080/2159032X.2022.2126205
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Human rights discourses have significant relevance to contemporary understandings of heritage and its conservation, particularly in the context of the key international conventions for safeguarding the world's cultural heritage promulgated by UNESCO. The right to heritage is recognized as a human right falling under the right to culture or cultural identity. However, states are the primary bodies responsible for heritage identification and conservation, and may prefer to preserve the heritage of dominant social groups. Heritage identification and management by states, including the nomination of items for inclusion on the World Heritage List of the Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage and the Representative List of the Convention for Safeguarding the Intangible Cultural Heritage, thus has the potential to compromise the cultural rights of marginalized social groups, including women. Existing research and original research discussed herein reveal a dearth of heritage associated with women on both Lists. However, the problematic gender dynamics of this discourse goes beyond simple representativeness to encompass the ways in which women and their heritage are portrayed. The Representative List typically seeks to maintain existing social relations, including gender relations, with negative implications for women's human rights set out in the UN Convention to Eliminate all Forms of Discrimination Against Women.
引用
收藏
页码:242 / 266
页数:25
相关论文
共 94 条
  • [11] Baksh R., 2015, The Oxford handbook of transnational feminist movements, DOI DOI 10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780199943494.001.0001
  • [12] Beitz Charles., 2003, DAEDALUS-US, V132, P36
  • [13] Belgian Government, 2011, LEUV AG SET RIT REP
  • [14] Bennett J., 2017, VINDICATION RIGHTS W
  • [15] Bennoune Karima, 2016, Report of the Special Rapporteur in the Field of Cultural Rights (A/HRC/31/59)
  • [16] Nominalizing and de-nominalizing: a reply
    Billig, Michael
    [J]. DISCOURSE & SOCIETY, 2008, 19 (06) : 829 - 841
  • [17] Blake J., 2014, Gender Equality, Heritage and Creativity, P48
  • [18] Blake J, 2018, KEY ISSUES CULT HERI, P207
  • [19] Seven Years of Implementing UNESCO's 2003 Intangible Heritage Convention-Honeymoon Period or the "Seven-Year Itch"?
    Blake, Janet
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CULTURAL PROPERTY, 2014, 21 (03) : 291 - 304
  • [20] Bourdieu Pierre., 2006, Inequality: Classic Readings in Race, Class, and Gender, P257, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780429499838-18