The Green Hydrogen Puzzle: Towards a German Policy Framework for Industry

被引：16

作者：

Tholen, Lena ^{[1
]}

Leipprand, Anna ^{[1
]}

Kiyar, Dagmar ^{[1
]}

Maier, Sarah ^{[2
]}

Kueper, Malte ^{[2
]}

Adisorn, Thomas ^{[1
]}

Fischer, Andreas ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Wuppertal Inst, Doeppersberg 19, D-42103 Wuppertal, Germany

[2] German Econ Inst, Konrad Adenauer Ufer 21, D-50668 Cologne, Germany

来源：

SUSTAINABILITY | 2021年 / 13卷 / 22期

关键词：

green hydrogen; climate-neutral industry; carbon dioxide emissions; policy package; multi-criteria analysis; CLIMATE;

D O I：

10.3390/su132212626

中图分类号：

X [环境科学、安全科学];

学科分类号：

08 ; 0830 ;

摘要：

Green hydrogen will play a key role in building a climate-neutral energy-intensive industry, as key technologies for defossilising the production of steel and basic chemicals depend on it. Thus, policy-making needs to support the creation of a market for green hydrogen and its use in industry. However, it is unclear how appropriate policies should be designed, and a number of challenges need to be addressed. Based on an analysis of the ongoing German debate on hydrogen policies, this paper analyses how policy-making for green hydrogen development may support industry defossilisation. For the assessment of policy instruments, a simplified multi-criteria analysis (MCA) is used with an innovative approach that derives criteria from specific challenges. Four challenges and seven relevant policy instruments are identified. The results of the MCA reveal the potential of each of the selected instruments to address the challenges. The paper furthermore outlines how instruments might be combined in a policy package that supports industry defossilisation, creates synergies and avoids trade-offs. The paper's impact may reach beyond the German case, as the challenges are not specific to the country. The results are relevant for policy-makers in other countries with energy-intensive industries aiming to set the course towards a hydrogen future.

引用

页数：19

共 72 条

[11] Chiappinelli O., 2020, DIW Berlin Discussion Paper No. 1859
[12] Crone K., 2020, GLOBAL ALLIANCE POWE
[13] del Rio P., 2012, Assessment criteria for identifying the main alternatives (beyond 2020-D2-2)
[14] Dena-Leitstudie Integrierte Energiewende, 2018, IMP GEST EN BIS 2050
[15] Deutsche Emissionshandelsstelle im Umweltbundesamt (DEHSt), 2019, LEITF ZUT 2021 203 1
[16] Deutscher Verein des Gas- und Wasserfachs e.V, 2018, KLIM GRUN GAS WIE KO
[17] E.ON, EON FORD QUOT GRUN G
[18] Enagas Energinet Fluxys Belgium Gasunie GRTgaz NET4GAS OGE ONTRAS Snam, 2020, EUR HYDR BACKB DED H
[19] Energy Brainpool, 2018, WEG WETTB EL ERN URS
[20] European Commission, 2019, COM2019640 EUR COMM

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 →