Comprehensive Evaluation of Machine Learning Techniques for Hydrological Drought Forecasting

被引:29
|
作者
Jehanzaib, Muhammad [1 ]
Idrees, Muhammad Bilal [2 ]
Kim, Dongkyun [3 ]
Kim, Tae-Woong [4 ]
机构
[1] Hanyang Univ, Res Inst Engn & Technol, Ansan 15588, South Korea
[2] Hanyang Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Seoul 04763, South Korea
[3] Hongik Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Seoul 04066, South Korea
[4] Hanyang Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Ansan 15588, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Drought forecasting; Machine learning (ML); Standardized runoff index (SRI); Decision tree (DT); METEOROLOGICAL DROUGHT; RIVER-BASIN; MODEL;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001575
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
Drought is among the most hazardous climatic disasters that significantly influence various aspects of the environment and human life. Qualitative and reliable drought forecasting is important worldwide for effective planning and decision-making in disaster-prone regions. Data-driven models have been extensively used for drought forecasting, but due to the inadequacy of information on model performance, the selection of an appropriate forecasting model remains a challenge. This study concerns a comparative analysis of six machine learning (ML) techniques widely used for hydrological drought forecasting. The standardized runoff index (SRI) was calculated at a seasonal (3-month) time scale for the period 1973 to 2016 in four selected watersheds of the Han River basin in South Korea. The ML models employed were built-ins, using precipitation, temperature, and humidity as input variables and the SRI as the target variable. The results indicated that all the ML models were able to map the relationship for seasonal SRI using the applied input vectors. The decision tree (DT) technique outperformed in all the watersheds with an average mean absolute error (MAE) = 0.26, root mean square error (RMSE) = 0.34, Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) = 0.87, and coefficient of determination (R-2) = 0.89. The performances of the support vector machine (SVM) and deep learning neural network (DLNN) were similar, whereas the fuzzy rule-based system (FRBS) performed very well compared to the artificial neural network (ANN) and the adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS). The overall findings of this study indicate that, considering performance criteria and computation time, the DT was the most accurate ML technique for hydrological drought forecasting in the Han River basin. (C) 2021 American Society of Civil Engineers.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of stochastic and machine learning methods for multi-step ahead forecasting of hydrological processes
    Papacharalampous, Georgia
    Tyralis, Hristos
    Koutsoyiannis, Demetris
    STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2019, 33 (02) : 481 - 514
  • [42] Seasonal forecasting of hydrological drought in the Limpopo Basin: a comparison of statistical methods
    Seibert, Mathias
    Merz, Bruno
    Apel, Heiko
    HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2017, 21 (03) : 1611 - 1629
  • [43] A Comprehensive Review of Machine Learning Techniques for Condition-Based Maintenance
    Ward, Tyler
    Jenab, Kouroush
    Ortega-Moody, Jorge
    Staub, Selva
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROGNOSTICS AND HEALTH MANAGEMENT, 2024, 15 (02)
  • [44] Machine learning innovations in CPR: a comprehensive survey on enhanced resuscitation techniques
    Saidul Islam
    Gaith Rjoub
    Hanae Elmekki
    Jamal Bentahar
    Witold Pedrycz
    Robin Cohen
    Artificial Intelligence Review, 58 (8)
  • [45] Hydrological drought forecasting under a changing environment in the Luanhe River basin
    Li, Min
    Zhang, Mingfeng
    Cao, Runxiang
    Sun, Yidi
    Deng, Xiyuan
    NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2023, 23 (04) : 1453 - 1464
  • [46] A review of machine learning methods for drought hazard monitoring and forecasting: Current research trends, challenges, and future research directions
    Prodhan, Foyez Ahmed
    Zhang, Jiahua
    Hasan, Shaikh Shamim
    Sharma, Til Prasad Pangali
    Mohana, Hasiba Pervin
    ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2022, 149
  • [47] An approach to portfolio optimization with time series forecasting algorithms and machine learning techniques
    Behera, Jyotirmayee
    Kumar, Pankaj
    APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2025, 170
  • [48] Applying sustainable development goals in financial forecasting using machine learning techniques
    Chang, Ariana
    Lee, Tian-Shyug
    Lee, Hsiu-Mei
    CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 31 (03) : 2277 - 2289
  • [49] Sales forecasting by combining clustering and machine-learning techniques for computer retailing
    Chen, I-Fei
    Lu, Chi-Jie
    NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS, 2017, 28 (09) : 2633 - 2647
  • [50] Short-term nodal load forecasting based on machine learning techniques
    Lu, Dan
    Zhao, Dongbo
    Li, Zuyi
    INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRICAL ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2021, 31 (09):