The Effects of Transparency and Reliability of In-Vehicle Intelligent Agents on Driver Perception, Takeover Performance, Workload and Situation Awareness in Conditionally Automated Vehicles

被引:9
作者
Zang, Jing [1 ]
Jeon, Myounghoon [1 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Tech, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
关键词
automated vehicle; explainable AI; situation awareness (SA); transparency; reliability; trust; TRUST; FEEDBACK; SAFETY; MODEL;
D O I
10.3390/mti6090082
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In the context of automated vehicles, transparency of in-vehicle intelligent agents (IVIAs) is an important contributor to driver perception, situation awareness (SA), and driving performance. However, the effects of agent transparency on driver performance when the agent is unreliable have not been fully examined yet. This paper examined how transparency and reliability of the IVIAs affect drivers' perception of the agent, takeover performance, workload and SA. A 2 x 2 mixed factorial design was used in this study, with transparency (Push: proactive vs. Pull: on-demand) as a within-subjects variable and reliability (high vs. low) as a between-subjects variable. In a driving simulator, 27 young drivers drove with two types of in-vehicle agents during the conditionally automated driving. Results suggest that transparency influenced participants' perception on the agent and perceived workload. High reliability agent was associated with higher situation awareness and less effort, compared to low reliability agent. There was an interaction effect between transparency and reliability on takeover performance. These findings could have important implications for the continued design and development of IVIAs of the automated vehicle system.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2016, SAE INT
[2]   Analysis of driver roles: modelling the changing role of the driver in automated driving systems using EAST [J].
Banks, Victoria A. ;
Stanton, Neville A. .
THEORETICAL ISSUES IN ERGONOMICS SCIENCE, 2019, 20 (03) :284-300
[3]   Measurement Instruments for the Anthropomorphism, Animacy, Likeability, Perceived Intelligence, and Perceived Safety of Robots [J].
Bartneck, Christoph ;
Kulic, Dana ;
Croft, Elizabeth ;
Zoghbi, Susana .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ROBOTICS, 2009, 1 (01) :71-81
[4]  
Cacioppo J T, 1997, Pers Soc Psychol Rev, V1, P3, DOI 10.1207/s15327957pspr0101_2
[5]   The Robotic Social Attributes Scale (RoSAS): Development and Validation [J].
Carpinella, Colleen M. ;
Wyman, Alisa B. ;
Perez, Michael A. ;
Stroessner, Steven J. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 ACM/IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION (HRI'17), 2017, :254-262
[6]  
Chen J.Y., 2014, Situation awareness-based agent transparency
[7]   Situation awareness-based agent transparency and human-autonomy teaming effectiveness [J].
Chen, Jessie Y. C. ;
Lakhmani, Shan G. ;
Stowers, Kimberly ;
Selkowitz, Anthony R. ;
Wright, Julia L. ;
Barnes, Michael .
THEORETICAL ISSUES IN ERGONOMICS SCIENCE, 2018, 19 (03) :259-282
[8]  
Chen JYC, 2014, IEEE T HUM-MACH SYST, V44, P13, DOI [10.1109/THMS.2013.2293535, 10.1504/IJMIC.2014.063872]
[9]   Exploring issues of user model transparency and proactive behaviour in an office environment control system [J].
Cheverst, K ;
Byun, HE ;
Fitton, D ;
Sas, C ;
Kray, C ;
Villar, N .
USER MODELING AND USER-ADAPTED INTERACTION, 2005, 15 (3-4) :235-273
[10]   From "automation' to "autonomy': the importance of trust repair in human-machine interaction [J].
de Visser, Ewart J. ;
Pak, Richard ;
Shaw, Tyler H. .
ERGONOMICS, 2018, 61 (10) :1409-1427