Involving practice nurses in primary care research: the experience of multiple and competing demands

被引:18
作者
Boase, Sue [1 ]
Kim, Youngsuk [1 ]
Craven, Anthea [2 ]
Cohn, Simon [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Gen Practice & Primary Care Res Unit, Cambridge CB2 1TN, England
[2] Univ Oxford, Primary Care Clin Trials Unit, Oxford OX1 2JD, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
clinical role; complex intervention; practice nurse; primary care; primary care research; research nurse; HEALTH-CARE; INTERVENTION; IMPLEMENTATION; INVOLVEMENT; GAP;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05764.x
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Aim. This paper is a report of a study of the experiences of practice nurses delivering a complex research intervention in an exploratory randomized controlled trial in primary care. Background. As practice nurses increasingly become involved in primary care research, it is important to understand not only what impact this may have on their existing role but also equally on what their potential contribution might be. Method. Fourteen of the 15 practice nurses involved in the delivery of a complex intervention were purposively sampled and interviewed in their workplace between June and October 2007. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed using a Framework Approach and NVivo software. Findings. Time influenced the nurses engagement with the various aspects of the trial and meant that they constantly had to make judgments and decisions in response to the multiple agendas presented to them: they had to negotiate a range of competing loyalties between their professional clinical role, their role in the research and practice teams and their relationship with patients. The nurses accounts consequently provide insight into the active role they played both in the trial process and the delivery of the complex intervention. Conclusion. The nurses were key to the delivery of the trial. If practice nurses are to develop a research role in their professional work, it is important to understand their perceptions and the impact such involvement has on them and their practice. Consideration of these factors is consequently valuable when developing research in primary care settings.
引用
收藏
页码:590 / 599
页数:10
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :179-211
[2]  
Allen S., 2010, PRACTICE NURSING, V21, P645, DOI [10.12968/pnur.2010.21.12.645, DOI 10.12968/PNUR.2010.21.12.645]
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Best research for best health: a new national health research strategy
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2006, OUR HLTH OUR CAR OUR
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Qualified graduate nurses: recommendations for preparing and supporting clinical academic nurses of the future
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2003, NEW GMS CONTRACT 200
[7]   Using reflexivity to optimize teamwork in qualitative research [J].
Barry, CA ;
Britten, N ;
Barber, N ;
Bradley, C ;
Stevenson, F .
QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 1999, 9 (01) :26-44
[8]  
Bateman H, 2006, Quality in primary care, V14, P71
[9]   From expert to tasks, expert nursing practice redefined? [J].
Christensen, Martin ;
Hewitt-Taylor, Jaqui .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2006, 15 (12) :1531-1539
[10]  
Cooke J., 2007, PRIM HEALTH CARE RES, V8, P292