Uptake of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and impact on invasive procedures in a tertiary referral center

被引:17
|
作者
Manegold-Brauer, Gwendolin [1 ,2 ]
Berg, C. [1 ,3 ]
Floeck, A. [1 ]
Rueland, A. [1 ]
Gembruch, U. [1 ]
Geipel, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Sch Bonn, Dept Obstet & Prenatal Med, D-53105 Bonn, Germany
[2] Univ Med Sch Basel, Dept Prenatal Med & Gynecol Ultrasound, Basel, Switzerland
[3] Univ Med Sch Cologne, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Prenatal Med & Gynecol Ultrasound, Cologne, Germany
关键词
NIPT; NIPD; Cell-free fetal DNA; Fetal aneuploidies; Prenatal counseling; Non-invasive prenatal testing; Trisomy; 21; CELL-FREE DNA; FETAL DNA; ANEUPLOIDY; TRISOMY-21; DIAGNOSIS; WOMEN; POSITION; SOCIETY; RATES; CARE;
D O I
10.1007/s00404-015-3674-5
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
The introduction of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) by isolation of cell-free fetal DNA from maternal blood is a new diagnostic option in prenatal care. The aim of the study was to investigate the algorithm of prenatal testing before and after the introduction of NIPT in a tertiary referral center and to investigate the influence of NIPT on the frequency of invasive procedures. Retrospective data analysis was conducted of all singleton pregnancies that presented for first trimester screening 17 months before and after the introduction of NIPT (n = 2271). Women were categorized into three risk groups: low risk for trisomy 21 (< 1:1000), intermediate risk (1:101-1:1000) and high risk (a parts per thousand yen1:100). The choice of diagnostic testing after FTS was analyzed. 1093 (group 1) presented before and 1178 (group 2) after the introduction of NIPT. The rate of high-risk patients was equal in both groups (14.4 vs. 15.4 %). No differences were found with regard to invasive testing (11.6 vs. 11.3 %). NIPT was chosen by 3.7 % (44/1178) in group 2. Of those with NIPT, 72.7 % had a risk estimate of < 1:100, but 90.9 % were a parts per thousand yen35 years old. The rate of NIPT among high-risk patients with a normal ultrasound examination was 25 %. At present, NIPT is chosen mainly for reassurance by patients not considered to be at high risk. In the high-risk group, NIPT can be offered if the ultrasound examination is normal and the risk is high due to maternal age or serum screening alone. The rate of invasive testing was not reduced in this selected population.
引用
收藏
页码:543 / 548
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Non-invasive prenatal testing
    Harraway, James
    AUSTRALIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2017, 46 (10) : 735 - 739
  • [42] Non invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in IVF patients
    Terzuoli, G.
    Furlan, V.
    Lapucci, C.
    Cro, F.
    Boschetto, C. E.
    Bianchi, V.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2016, 31 : 405 - 406
  • [43] Maternal age trends support uptake of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in the low-risk population
    Chen, Kelly M.
    White, Karen
    Shabbeer, Junaid
    Schmid, Maximilian
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2019, 32 (23): : 4039 - 4042
  • [44] NON-INVASIVE PRENATAL TESTING The promise of non-invasive prenatal testing needs to be monitored scientifically
    Lonardo, Fortunato
    Gioacchino, Scarano
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 350
  • [45] Impact of non-invasive prenatal testing in the detection of aneuploidy
    Ortiz, C. Valldecabres
    Garcia, F. De la Fuente
    Pintado, S. Gorriz
    CLINICA E INVESTIGACION EN GINECOLOGIA Y OBSTETRICIA, 2024, 51 (04):
  • [46] Determining the impact of NIPT on the uptake of invasive diagnostic testing
    Gulati, Nidhi
    Bullows, Lisa
    Gurney, Leo
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2023, 130 : 39 - 40
  • [47] Determining the impact of NIPT on the uptake of invasive diagnostic testing
    Gulati, Nidhi
    Bullows, Lisa
    Gurney, Leo
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2023, 130 : 39 - 40
  • [48] Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) versus diagnostic testing for evaluation of fetal structural anomalies
    Mardy, Anne H.
    Zachary, Julia
    Clifton, Rebecca
    Wou, Karen
    Levy, Brynn
    Wapner, Ronald J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 216 (01) : S121 - S121
  • [49] Trends in invasive prenatal diagnosis from 2002-2014: effect of sequential screening and non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT)
    Khalifeh, Adeeb
    Weiner, Stuart
    Berghella, Vincenzo
    Donnenfeld, Alan
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 212 (01) : S226 - S226
  • [50] Non invasive prenatal testing (NIPT). New conception of prenatal diagnosis
    Kainer, F.
    GYNAKOLOGE, 2014, 47 (09): : 648 - 651