The Importance of Unitization for Familiarity-Based Learning

被引:103
作者
Parks, Colleen M. [1 ]
Yonelinas, Andrew P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nevada, Dept Psychol, Las Vegas, NV 89154 USA
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Psychol, Davis, CA USA
关键词
unitization; associative recognition; recollection; familiarity; MEDIAL TEMPORAL-LOBE; RECEIVER-OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS; CONCEPTUAL IMPLICIT MEMORY; SIGNAL-DETECTION-THEORY; RECOGNITION MEMORY; ASSOCIATIVE INFORMATION; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL EVIDENCE; PERIRHINAL CORTEX; EPISODIC MEMORY; RECOLLECTION;
D O I
10.1037/xlm0000068
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
It is often assumed that recollection is necessary to support memory for novel associations, whereas familiarity supports memory for single items. However, the levels of unitization framework assumes that familiarity can support associative memory under conditions in which the components of an association are unitized (i.e., treated as a single coherent item). In the current study we tested two critical assumptions of this framework. First, does unitization reflect a specialized form of learning or is it simply a form of semantic or elaborative encoding, and, second, can the beneficial effects of unitization on familiarity be observed for across-domain associations or are they limited to creating new associations between items that are from the same stimulus domains? Unitization was found to increase associative recognition but not item recognition. It affected familiarity more than recollection, increased associative but not item priming, and was dissociable from levels of processing effects. Moreover, unitization effects were found to be particularly effective in supporting face-word and fractal-sound pairs. The current results indicate that unitization reflects a specialized form of learning that supports associative familiarity of within- and across-domain associations.
引用
收藏
页码:881 / 903
页数:23
相关论文
共 73 条
[51]   Using fMR-adaptation to track complex object representations in perirhinal cortex [J].
Rubin, Rachael D. ;
Chesney, Samantha A. ;
Cohen, Neal J. ;
Gonsalves, Brian D. .
COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 4 (02) :107-114
[52]   Event-related potentials and recognition memory [J].
Rugg, Michael D. ;
Curran, Tim .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2007, 11 (06) :251-257
[53]   IMPLICIT MEMORY - EFFECTS OF ELABORATION DEPEND ON UNITIZATION [J].
SCHACTER, DL ;
MCGLYNN, SM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1989, 102 (02) :151-181
[54]   Inversion and processing of component and spatial-relational information in faces [J].
Searcy, JH ;
Bartlett, JC .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1996, 22 (04) :904-915
[55]   Superadditive Memory Strength for Item and Source Recognition: The Role of Hierarchical Relational Binding in the Medial Temporal Lobe [J].
Shimamura, Arthur P. ;
Wickens, Thomas D. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2009, 116 (01) :1-19
[56]   Selective and shared contributions of the hippocampus and perirhinal cortex to episodic item and associative encoding [J].
Staresina, Bernhard P. ;
Davachi, Lila .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2008, 20 (08) :1478-1489
[57]   Object Unitization and Associative Memory Formation Are Supported by Distinct Brain Regions [J].
Staresina, Bernhard P. ;
Davachi, Lila .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2010, 30 (29) :9890-9897
[58]   PERCEPTUAL OBJECTS AND THE COST OF FILTERING [J].
TREISMAN, A ;
KAHNEMAN, D ;
BURKELL, J .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1983, 33 (06) :527-532
[59]   Recognition memory for single items and for associations in amnesic patients [J].
Turriziani, P ;
Fadda, L ;
Caltagirone, C ;
Carlesimo, GA .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2004, 42 (04) :426-433
[60]   Differential effects of early hippocampal pathology on episodic and semantic memory [J].
VarghaKhadem, F ;
Gadian, DG ;
Watkins, KE ;
Connelly, A ;
VanPaesschen, W ;
Mishkin, M .
SCIENCE, 1997, 277 (5324) :376-380