God or the subject? Karl Barth's critique of the "turn to the subject"

被引:1
作者
Grube, Dirk-Martin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Dept Godgeleerdheid, NL-3584 CS Utrecht, Netherlands
来源
NEUE ZEITSCHRIFT FUR SYSTEMATISCHE THEOLOGIE UND RELIGIONSPHILOSOPHIE | 2007年 / 49卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1515/NZST.2007.021
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
In this article, I argue that Barth resists the modern "turn to the subject" and that important features of his approach can be explained as being motivated by this resistance. Under the parameters of this "turn", the human subject occupies a position which should be reserved for God. As an antidote to this turn, Barth suggests an exchange of subjects: The role that the subject occupies under subjectivist parameters should be taken over by a Trinitarian notion of God. This suggestion explains to a great extent the approach he takes since his famous "breakthrough" and explains also his harsh rejection of Brunner. © Walter de Gruyter 2007.
引用
收藏
页码:308 / 324
页数:17
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
AYER AJ, 1958, LANGUAGE TRUTH LOGIC, P115
[2]  
BARTH K, 1947, LEHRE SCHOPFUNG, V13, P408
[3]  
BARTH K, 1980, DOCTRINE GOD 1, V2, P67
[4]  
BARTH K, 1934, THEOLOGISCHE EXISTEN, V14, P5
[5]  
BARTH K, 1980, DOCTRINE WORD GOD 2, V1
[6]  
Barth Karl., 1991, GOTTINGEN DOGMATICS, V1
[7]  
Barth Karl., 1990, UNTERRICHT CHRISTLIC
[8]  
Barth Karl, 1985, UNTERRICHT CHRISTLIC
[9]  
Beintker M., 1987, Die Dialektik in der "dialektischen Theologie" Karl Barths: Studien zur Entwicklung der Barthschen Theologie und zur Vorgeschichte der "Kirchlichen Dogmatik"
[10]  
BRUNNER E, 1935, NATUR GNADE