Evaluation of two RT-PCR techniques for SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection in serum for microbiological diagnosis

被引:6
|
作者
Martin Ramirez, Alexandra [1 ]
Zurita Cruz, Nelly Daniela [1 ]
Gutierrez-Cobos, Ainhoa [1 ]
Rodriguez Serrano, Diego Anibal [2 ]
Gonzalez Alvaro, Isidoro [3 ]
Roy Vallejo, Emilia [4 ]
Gomez de Frutos, Sara [1 ]
Fontan Garcia-Rodrigo, Leticia [1 ]
Cardenoso Domingo, Laura [1 ]
机构
[1] La Princesa Univ Hosp, Clin Microbiol Dept, C Diego de Leon 62, Madrid 28006, Spain
[2] La Princesa Univ Hosp, Intes Care Dept, Madrid, Spain
[3] La Princesa Univ Hosp, Rheumatol Dept, Madrid, Spain
[4] La Princesa Univ Hosp, Internal Med Dept, Madrid, Spain
关键词
SARS-CoV-2; RNA; Serum; rRT-PCR; COVID-19; CORONAVIRUS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jviromet.2021.114411
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in serum (viremia) of COVID-19 patients has been related to poor prognosis and death. The aim of this study was to evaluate both the ability to detect viremia in COVID-19 patients of two commercial reverse real-time-PCR (rRT-PCR) tests, Cobas (R) and TaqPath (TM), comparing them with a gold standard method, and their implementation in microbiology laboratories. This retrospective cohort study included 303 adult patients (203 diagnosed with COVID-19 and 100 nonCOVID-19 patients) admitted to a tertiary hospital, with at least one serum sample collected within the first 48 h from admission. A total of 365 serum samples were included: 100 from non-COVID patients (pre-pandemic and pandemic control groups) and 265 from COVID-19 patients. Serum samples were considered positive when at least one target was detected. All patients in control groups showed negative viremia. Cobas (R) and TaqPath (TM) tests showed specificity and Positive Predictive Value over 96%. Nevertheless, sensitivity (53.72 and 73.63, respectively) and Negative Predictive Value (64.78 and 75) were lower. Viremia difference between ICU and non-ICU patients was significant (p < 0.001) for both techniques. Consequently, SARS-CoV-2 viremia detection by both rRT-PCR tests should be considered a good tool to stratify COVID-19 patients and could be implemented in microbiology laboratories.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Assessment of 12 qualitative RT-PCR commercial kits for the detection of SARS-CoV-2
    Altamimi, Asmaa M.
    Obeid, Dalia A.
    Alaifan, Taghreed A.
    Taha, Moroje T.
    Alhothali, Marwa T.
    Alzahrani, Fahad A.
    Albarrag, Ahmad M.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 2021, 93 (05) : 3219 - 3226
  • [12] Evaluation of the RealStar® SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR kit RUO performances and limit of detection
    Visseaux, Benoit
    Le Hingrat, Quentin
    Collin, Gilles
    Ferre, Valentine
    Storto, Alexandre
    Ichou, Houria
    Bouzid, Donia
    Poey, Nora
    de Montmollin, Etienne
    Descamps, Diane
    Houhou-Fidouh, Nadhira
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY, 2020, 129
  • [13] Value of swab types and collection time on SARS-COV-2 detection using RT-PCR assay
    Liu, Min
    Li, Qianyuan
    Zhou, Jun
    Ai, Wen
    Zheng, Xiaoling
    Zeng, Jingjing
    Liu, Yuwen
    Xiang, Xiying
    Guo, Rong
    Li, Xiaoyin
    Wu, Xiandi
    Xu, Haiying
    Jiang, Ling
    Zhang, Huaqin
    Chen, Jing
    Tian, Lili
    Luo, Jun
    Luo, Chunhua
    JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS, 2020, 286
  • [14] The Matrix Effect in the RT-PCR Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Using Saliva without RNA Extraction
    Morais, Orlando
    Alves, Manuel Rui
    Ramos, Carla
    Ferreira, Fernando
    Fernandes, Paulo
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2022, 12 (07)
  • [15] Large-scale implementation of pooled RNA extraction and RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 detection
    Ben-Ami, R.
    Klochendler, A.
    Seidel, M.
    Sido, T.
    Gurel-Gurevich, O.
    Yassour, M.
    Meshorer, E.
    Benedek, G.
    Fogel, I.
    Oiknine-Djian, E.
    Gertler, A.
    Rotstein, Z.
    Lavi, B.
    Dor, Y.
    Wolf, D. G.
    Salton, M.
    Drier, Y.
    CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2020, 26 (09) : 1248 - 1253
  • [16] A Direct Method for RT-PCR Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Clinical Samples
    El-Kafrawy, Sherif A.
    El-Daly, Mai M.
    Hassan, Ahmed M.
    Kaki, Reham M.
    Abuzenadah, Adel M.
    Kamal, Mohammad A.
    Azhar, Esam I.
    HEALTHCARE, 2021, 9 (01)
  • [17] Comparison of FTD SARS-CoV-2 Assay and RealStar RT-PCR kit 1.0 for the detection of SARS-CoV-2
    Di Carlo, Daniele
    Mazzuti, Laura
    Sciandra, Ilaria
    Guerrizio, Giuliana
    Oliveto, Giuseppe
    Cabral, Rodolfo J. Riveros
    Zingaropoli, Maria Antonella
    Turriziani, Ombretta
    JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS, 2021, 298
  • [18] Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR Using Different Sample Sources: Review of the Literature
    Torretta, Sara
    Zuccotti, Gianvincenzo
    Cristofaro, Valentina
    Ettori, Jacopo
    Solimeno, Lorenzo
    Battilocchi, Ludovica
    D'Onghia, Alessandra
    Bonsembiante, Anna
    Pignataro, Lorenzo
    Marchisio, Paola
    Capaccio, Pasquale
    ENT-EAR NOSE & THROAT JOURNAL, 2021, 100 (2_SUPPL) : 131S - 138S
  • [19] Diagnostic accuracy of saliva as a specimen for detection of SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR
    Gupta, Megha
    Sinha, Parul
    Gupta, Sandeep
    Jain, Dinesh K.
    Hooja, Saroj
    Vyas, Nitya
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY AND MICROBIOLOGY, 2022, 65 (04) : 907 - 910
  • [20] A Community Study of SARS-CoV-2 Detection by RT-PCR in Saliva: A Reliable and Effective Method
    Fronza, Filippo
    Groff, Nelli
    Martinelli, Angela
    Passerini, Beatrice Zita
    Rensi, Nicolo
    Cortelletti, Irene
    Vivori, Nicolo
    Adami, Valentina
    Helander, Anna
    Bridi, Simone
    Pancher, Michael
    Greco, Valentina
    Garritano, Sonia Iolanda
    Piffer, Elena
    Stefani, Lara
    De Sanctis, Veronica
    Bertorelli, Roberto
    Pancheri, Serena
    Collini, Lucia
    Dassi, Erik
    Quattrone, Alessandro
    Capobianchi, Maria Rosaria
    Icardi, Giancarlo
    Poli, Guido
    Caciagli, Patrizio
    Ferro, Antonio
    Pizzato, Massimo
    VIRUSES-BASEL, 2022, 14 (02):