Increasing Nasal Tip Projection Using Structural Grafts: A Review of Outcomes

被引:1
作者
Chun, Magnus J.
Kumar, Taruni
O'Connell, Samantha
Metzinger, Stephen
机构
[1] Tulane Univ, Sch Med, Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, 1430 Tulane Ave, New Orleans, LA 70112 USA
[2] Tulane Univ, Off Acad Affairs & Provost, New Orleans, LA 70112 USA
关键词
columellar strut grafts; nasal tip project; rhinoplasty; septal extension grafts; SEPTAL EXTENSION GRAFTS; COLUMELLAR STRUT GRAFT; SHORT NOSE CORRECTION; NASOLABIAL ANGLE; OPEN RHINOPLASTY; CARTILAGE GRAFT; AUGMENTATION; ROTATION; PLASTY; GAIN;
D O I
10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001458
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives Nasal tip projection (NTP) is an important criterion when evaluating the result of rhinoplasties. Increasing NTP is essential for nasal function and visual aesthetics. Grafts such as columellar strut grafts (CSGs) and septal extension grafts (SEGs) are commonly used. We analyzed the safety and efficacy of the most commonly used grafts for increasing NTP during surgical rhinoplasty. Methods The authors reviewed all English-language articles in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science between 2000 and 2020 that reported original outcomes on structural grafts used to increase NTP. We recorded and analyzed the following at 6 months postoperatively: NTP change, Goode ratio, nasolabial/columellar-labial angle, postoperative complications, and subjective patient assessments. A total of two structural grafts in 35 studies (21 CSG, 14 SEG) were included. Results Of the 2290 included patients, 1707 received CSGs (21 studies) and 583 received SEGs (14 studies). Overall NTP increased after using either graft. Subgroup analysis showed that more patients experienced postoperative complications after receiving SEGs (23.7%) than CSGs (9.7%). For patient satisfaction, three CSG studies found 83.3% of patients rated their satisfaction high, 12.1% moderate, and 4.5% not satisfied (n = 66). Most patients reported improvement in tip projection (97.0%), breathing (86.4%), and olfaction (83.3%). There was a significant increase in average patient satisfaction on the Visual Analog Scale (n = 39). Conclusions Findings show that CSG and SEG grafts were safe and effective at increasing NTP. We suggest that CSG may be safer and more effective than SEG at increasing NTP in rhinoplasties. Further prospective studies may elucidate the mechanisms underlying the differences between CSGs and SEGs in patient safety and satisfaction when increasing NTP in surgical rhinoplasty.
引用
收藏
页码:765 / 772
页数:8
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   New Technique in Nasal Tip Plasty: Sandwich Technique Using Cartilage and Septal Bone Complex [J].
Ahn, Tae Hwan ;
Zheng, Tao ;
Kang, Hee Jeong ;
Yoo, Byung Joon ;
Chung, Jae Ho ;
Jeong, Jin Hyeok .
ENT-EAR NOSE & THROAT JOURNAL, 2020, 99 (09) :599-604
[2]   Comparison of the Effects of Columellar Strut and Septal Extension Grafts for Tip Support in Rhinoplasty [J].
Akkus, Ali Murat ;
Eryilmaz, Erhan ;
Guneren, Ethem .
AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2013, 37 (04) :666-673
[3]   Comparing the Effects of Tongue-In-Groove and Septocolumellar Suture With Short and Floating Columellar Strut of Open Rhinoplasty on Nasal Tip Rotation and Projection [J].
Aksakal, Ceyhun .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2021, 79 (02) :474.e1-474.e11
[4]   A Novel Technique for Short Nose Correction in Asians: M-Shaped Conchal Cartilage Combining With Septal Extension Graft [J].
An, Yang ;
Feng, Ning ;
Chen, Lujia ;
Yang, Xin ;
Yang, Xiao ;
Xia, Youchen ;
Xue, Hongyu ;
Li, Dong .
JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2019, 30 (05) :1560-1562
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2011, ISAPS International Survey on Aesthetic/Cosmetic Procedures Performed in 2011
[6]  
Apaydin F, 2009, ARCH FACIAL PLAST S, V11, P209, DOI 10.1001/archfacial.2009.35
[7]   Defining the Ideal Nasolabial Angle [J].
Armijo, Bryan S. ;
Brown, Matthew ;
Guyuron, Bahman .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2012, 129 (03) :759-764
[8]   Open rhinoplasty: Effectiveness of different tipplasty techniques to increase nasal tip projection [J].
Bafaqeeh, SA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2000, 21 (04) :231-237
[9]  
Balaji N., 2020, TXB NASAL TIP RHINOP, P123
[10]  
Beaty Mark M, 2002, Arch Facial Plast Surg, V4, P82, DOI 10.1001/archfaci.4.2.82