Analyzing user-generated content using natural language processing: a case study of public satisfaction with healthcare systems

被引:4
作者
Ruelens, Anna [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leuven, Res Inst Work & Soc, Pk Str 47,Box 5300, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
来源
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL SOCIAL SCIENCE | 2022年 / 5卷 / 01期
关键词
User-generated online content; Sentiment analysis; Text mining; Healthcare systems; Public attitudes; Computational social science; POPULAR SUPPORT;
D O I
10.1007/s42001-021-00148-2
中图分类号
O1 [数学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
While user-generated online content (UGC) is increasingly available, public opinion studies are yet to fully exploit the abundance and richness of online data. This study contributes to the practical knowledge of user-generated online content and machine learning techniques that can be used for the analysis of UGC. For this purpose, we explore the potential of user-generated content and present an application of natural language pre-processing, text mining and sentiment analysis to the question of public satisfaction with healthcare systems. Concretely, we analyze 634 online comments reflecting attitudes towards healthcare services in different countries. Our analysis identifies the frequency of topics related to healthcare services in textual content of the comments and attempts to classify and rank national healthcare systems based on the respondents' sentiment scores. In this paper, we describe our approach, summarize our main findings, and compare them with the results from cross-national surveys. Finally, we outline the typical limitations inherent in the analysis of user-generated online content and suggest avenues for future research.
引用
收藏
页码:731 / 749
页数:19
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
Badano A, 2018, JAMA NETW OPEN, V1, DOI [10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.5474, 10.1007/s42001-018-0015-z]
[2]   How does satisfaction with the health-care system relate to patient experience? [J].
Bleich, Sara N. ;
Oezaltin, Emre ;
Murray, Christopher J. L. .
BULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, 2009, 87 (04) :271-278
[3]   Who has the best health care system? A second look [J].
Blendon, RJ ;
Benson, J ;
Donelan, K ;
Leitman, R ;
Taylor, H ;
Koeck, C ;
Gitterman, D .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 1995, 14 (04) :220-230
[4]  
Bonikowski, 2017, TRAJECTORIES NEWSLET, V28, P29
[5]   Changing the politics of social programmes: Innovative change in British and French welfare reforms [J].
Bonoli, G ;
Palier, B .
JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN SOCIAL POLICY, 1998, 8 (04) :317-330
[6]   The Influence of Private Health Care Financing on Citizen Trust in Government [J].
Cammett, Melani ;
Lynch, Julia ;
Bilev, Gavril .
PERSPECTIVES ON POLITICS, 2015, 13 (04) :938-957
[7]   Age and health status in a patient satisfaction survey [J].
Cohen, G .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1996, 42 (07) :1085-1093
[8]   The Future of Modes of Data Collection [J].
Couper, Mick P. .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 2011, 75 (05) :889-908
[9]   The value of unsolicited online data in drug policy research [J].
Enghoff, Oskar ;
Aldridge, Judith .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY, 2019, 73 :210-218
[10]  
Feinerer I., 2008, R NEWS, V8, P19, DOI DOI 10.1108/09504120810885036