The role of Sargassum macroalgal wrack in reducing coastal erosion

被引:19
作者
Innocenti, Rachel A. [1 ]
Feagin, Rusty A. [1 ,2 ]
Huff, Thomas P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Ecosyst Sci & Management, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Ocean Engn, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
关键词
Beach wrack; Macroalgae wrack; Dune erosion; Soft engineering; Coastal management; BIOLOGICAL SOIL CRUSTS; CALIFORNIA KELP BEDS; SEA-LEVEL RISE; BEACHES; VULNERABILITY; MACROFAUNA; BENEFIT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecss.2018.09.021
中图分类号
Q17 [水生生物学];
学科分类号
071004 ;
摘要
Sea level rise and increased frequency of high-energy storms are contributing to the retreat of coastlines, impacting both natural features and coastal communities. "Soft solutions", or natural alternatives to engineered structures, have gained popularity in beach erosion mitigation; however, wrack as a method of erosion prevention remains an understudied option. The objective of our study was to test if a globally-distributed macroalgae, Sargassum spp., could act as a natural solution to moderate coastal erosion. We used a flume and increasing volumes of sargassum to consider three erosional processes at specific locations of the cross-shore profile: wave formation offshore, scouring velocity in the swash zone, and erosion on embryonic dunes. As the quantity of sargassum increased, the measureable attributes of these processes were reduced in a strongly significant manner, with large amounts of sargassum linked to 12% wave attenuation, 46% scouring velocity reduction, and 103% dune erosion reduction. Even with the lightest covering of sargassum tested, embryonic dune erosion was reduced 6% when compared to the control. These results indicate sargassum, and likely many other types of wrack, are a viable resource to help mitigate daily beach erosion.
引用
收藏
页码:82 / 88
页数:7
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
Adams C.B., 1986, Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Coastal Engineering, American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, USA, P1729
[2]  
Battjes J.A., 1974, Proceedings of the 14th International Coastal Engineering Conference, V, P446
[3]   Vulnerability of desert biological soil crusts to wind erosion: the influences of crust development, soil texture, and disturbance [J].
Belnap, J ;
Gillette, DA .
JOURNAL OF ARID ENVIRONMENTS, 1998, 39 (02) :133-142
[4]  
Belnap J, 1997, LAND DEGRAD DEV, V8, P355, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-145X(199712)8:4<355::AID-LDR266>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-H
[6]  
Black K, 2001, J COASTAL RES, P1
[7]   Erosion hazard vulnerability of US coastal counties [J].
Boruff, BJ ;
Emrich, C ;
Cutter, SL .
JOURNAL OF COASTAL RESEARCH, 2005, 21 (05) :932-942
[8]   The Economic Benefit of Coastal Erosion Control in Korea [J].
Chang, Jeong-In ;
Yoon, Sungsoon .
JOURNAL OF COASTAL RESEARCH, 2016, :1317-1321
[9]   Working with natural processes: the challenge for coastal protection strategies [J].
Cooper, J. A. G. ;
McKenna, J. .
GEOGRAPHICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 174 :315-331
[10]   The response of macrofauna communities and shorebirds to macrophyte wrack subsidies on exposed sandy beaches of southern California [J].
Dugan, JE ;
Hubbard, DM ;
McCrary, MD ;
Pierson, MO .
ESTUARINE COASTAL AND SHELF SCIENCE, 2003, 58 :25-40