Prior and Present Evidence: How Prior Experience Interacts with Present Information in a Perceptual Decision Making Task

被引:17
作者
Karim, Muhsin [1 ,2 ]
Harris, Justin A. [3 ]
Morley, John W. [4 ]
Breakspear, Michael [1 ,2 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ New S Wales, Sch Psychiat, Fac Med, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Black Dog Inst, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ New S Wales, Sch Psychol, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ Western Sydney, Sch Med, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] Queensland Inst Med Res, Brisbane, Qld 4006, Australia
[6] Royal Brisbane & Womens Hosp, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
TIME-ORDER ERRORS; SENSORY-DISCRIMINATION; WORKING-MEMORY; NEURAL CODES; VIBROTACTILE STIMULI; FREQUENCY; FEEDBACK; FLUTTER;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0037580
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: Vibrotactile discrimination tasks have been used to examine decision making processes in the presence of perceptual uncertainty, induced by barely discernible frequency differences between paired stimuli or by the presence of embedded noise. One lesser known property of such tasks is that decisions made on a single trial may be biased by information from prior trials. An example is the time-order effect whereby the presentation order of paired stimuli may introduce differences in accuracy. Subjects perform better when the first stimulus lies between the second stimulus and the global mean of all stimuli on the judged dimension ("preferred" time-orders) compared to the alternative presentation order ("nonpreferred" time-orders). This has been conceptualised as a "drift" of the first stimulus representation towards the global mean of the stimulus-set (an internal standard). We describe the influence of prior information in relation to the more traditionally studied factors of interest in a classic discrimination task. Methodology: Sixty subjects performed a vibrotactile discrimination task with different levels of uncertainty parametrically induced by increasing task difficulty, aperiodic stimulus noise, and changing the task instructions whilst maintaining identical stimulus properties (the "context"). Principal Findings: The time-order effect had a greater influence on task performance than two of the explicit factors-task difficulty and noise-but not context. The influence of prior information increased with the distance of the first stimulus from the global mean, suggesting that the "drift" velocity of the first stimulus towards the global mean representation was greater for these trials. Conclusions/Significance: Awareness of the time-order effect and prior information in general is essential when studying perceptual decision making tasks. Implicit mechanisms may have a greater influence than the explicit factors under study. It also affords valuable insights into basic mechanisms of information accumulation, storage, sensory weighting, and processing in neural circuits.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   A Comparison of Neuronal and Behavioral Detection and Discrimination Performances in Rat Whisker System [J].
Adibi, Mehdi ;
Arabzadeh, Ehsan .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2011, 105 (01) :356-365
[2]  
Alcala-Quintana RO, 2011, Q J EXP PSYCHOL COLC, P1
[3]  
[Anonymous], NOVARTIS FDN S
[4]  
[Anonymous], NOVARTIS FDN S
[5]  
[Anonymous], NOVARTIS FDN S
[6]  
[Anonymous], PERCEPTION
[7]  
[Anonymous], NOVARTIS FDN S
[8]  
[Anonymous], PSYCHOL B
[9]   The psychophysics toolbox [J].
Brainard, DH .
SPATIAL VISION, 1997, 10 (04) :433-436
[10]   Analysing neuronal correlates of the comparison of two sequentially presented sensory stimuli [J].
Brody, CD ;
Hernández, A ;
Zainos, A ;
Lemus, L ;
Romo, R .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2002, 357 (1428) :1843-1850