Maximizing land cover classification accuracies produced by decision trees at continental to global scales

被引:231
作者
Friedl, MA [1 ]
Brodley, CE
Strahler, AH
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Dept Geog, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Purdue Univ, Sch Elect & Comp Engn, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[3] Boston Univ, Ctr Remote Sensing, Boston, MA 02215 USA
来源
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING | 1999年 / 37卷 / 02期
基金
美国国家航空航天局;
关键词
classification; decision trees; land cover;
D O I
10.1109/36.752215
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Classification of land cover from remotely sensed data at continental to global scales requires sophisticated algorithms and feature selection techniques to optimize classifier performance, We examine methods to maximize classification accuracies using decision trees to map land cover from multitemporal AVHRR imagery at continental and global scales, As part of our anal, sis ne test the utility of "boosting," a new technique developed to increase classification accuracy by forcing the learning (classification) algorithm to concentrate on those training observations that are most difficult to classify, Our results show that boosting consistently reduces misclassification rates by approximate to 20-50% depending on the data set in question, and that most of the benefit gained by boosting is achieved after seven boosting iterations, We also assess the utility of including phenological metrics and geographic position as additional features to the classification algorithm, We find that using derived phenological metrics produces little improvement in classification accuracy relative to using an annual time series of NDVI data, but that geographic position provides substantial pou er for predicting land cover types at continental and global scales. However, in order to avoid generating spurious classification accuracies using geographic position, training data must be distributed evenly; in geographic space.
引用
收藏
页码:969 / 977
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
BREIMAN L, 1984, CLASSIFICAITON REGRE
[2]   Global land cover classifications at 8 km spatial resolution: the use of training data derived from Landsat imagery in decision tree classifiers [J].
De Fries, RS ;
Hansen, M ;
Townshend, JRG ;
Sohlberg, R .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 1998, 19 (16) :3141-3168
[3]   Global discrimination of land cover types from metrics derived from AVHRR pathfinder data [J].
DeFries, R ;
Hansen, M ;
Townshend, J .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 1995, 54 (03) :209-222
[4]   NDVI-DERIVED LAND-COVER CLASSIFICATIONS AT A GLOBAL-SCALE [J].
DEFRIES, RS ;
TOWNSHEND, JRG .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 1994, 15 (17) :3567-3586
[5]  
FREUND Y, 1996, P COMPUTAT LEARNING, P23
[6]   Decision tree classification of land cover from remotely sensed data [J].
Friedl, MA ;
Brodley, CE .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 1997, 61 (03) :399-409
[7]  
GOWARD S, 1985, VEGETATION, V15, P237
[8]   GLOBAL LAND MONITORING FROM AVHRR - POTENTIAL AND LIMITATIONS [J].
GUTMAN, G ;
IGNATOV, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 1995, 16 (13) :2301-2309
[9]   Classification trees: An alternative to traditional land cover classifiers [J].
Hansen, M ;
Dubayah, R ;
DeFries, R .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 1996, 17 (05) :1075-1081
[10]   MONITORING EAST-AFRICAN VEGETATION USING AVHRR DATA [J].
JUSTICE, CO ;
HOLBEN, BN ;
GWYNNE, MD .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 1986, 7 (11) :1453-1474