Improved separation by at-column dilution in preparative hydrophilic interaction chromatography

被引:3
作者
Jaffuel, Geoffrey [1 ]
Chappuis, Laura [1 ]
Guillarme, Davy [2 ]
Turlings, Ted C. J. [1 ]
Glauser, Gaetan [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Neuchatel, Fac Sci, FARCE Lab, Rue Emile Argand 11, CH-2000 Neuchatel, Switzerland
[2] CMU, Univ Lausanne, Univ Geneva, Sch Pharmaceut Sci, Rue Michel Servet 1, CH-1206 Geneva, Switzerland
[3] Univ Neuchatel, Fac Sci, Neuchatel Platform Analyt Chem, Ave Bellevaux 51, CH-2000 Neuchatel, Switzerland
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
HPLC; Preparative chromatography; HILIC; At-column dilution; Efficiency; Peak capacity; INTERACTION LIQUID-CHROMATOGRAPHY; MASS-SPECTROMETRY; EXTRACTS; STRESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.chroma.2017.11.071
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
We evaluated at-column dilution (ACD), as a possible approach to reduce peak distortion caused by the injection of strong solvents in preparative hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC). Three model compounds, namely uridine, cytidine and guanosine were selected and injected either in conventional or ACD conditions, using various proportions of water and acetonitrile in the sample diluent. Plate number and peak capacity were systematically investigated under both isocratic and gradient elution conditions, respectively. In isocratic conditions, ACD was found to provide higher plate numbers with sample diluent containing more than 40% water, but lower plate numbers with injections of less than 40% water, in comparison to a conventional injection system at the preparative scale. These contrasting results were attributed to the fact that i) efficiency was fundamentally reduced in ACD, due to the low make-up flow rate that was used to flush the injection loop, but ii) the trend was reversed for highly aqueous injection thanks to the capacity of ACD to maintain similar efficiency regardless of the injection solvent. On the other hand, peak capacity was comparable between ACD and conventional systems in gradient elution for injections containing low amounts of water. However, ACD became increasingly advantageous as the proportion of water in the injection solvent and/or the injection volume increased. This was confirmed by the separation of a plant root aqueous extract. Altogether, our findings suggest that ACD is beneficial both in isocratic and gradient modes when strongly aqueous solutions are injected, offering an attractive approach to increase loadability, while preserving peak shapes in preparative HILIC. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:136 / 143
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Fundamentals of Preparative and Nonlinear Chromatography M
[2]   Two-pump at-column-dilution configuration for preparative liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry [J].
Blom, KF .
JOURNAL OF COMBINATORIAL CHEMISTRY, 2002, 4 (04) :295-301
[3]   Hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC)-a powerful separation technique [J].
Buszewski, Boguslaw ;
Noga, Sylwia .
ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2012, 402 (01) :231-247
[4]   Optimized liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry approach for the isolation of minor stress biomarkers in plant extracts and their identification by capillary nuclear magnetic resonance [J].
Glauser, Gaetan ;
Guillarme, Davy ;
Grata, Elia ;
Boccard, Julien ;
Thiocone, Aly ;
Carrupt, Pierre-Alain ;
Veuthey, Jean-Luc ;
Rudaz, Serge ;
Wolfender, Jean-Luc .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2008, 1180 (1-2) :90-98
[5]   Preparative liquid chromatography [J].
Guiochon, G .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2002, 965 (1-2) :129-161
[6]   Hydrophilic interaction chromatography [J].
Hemstrom, Petrus ;
Irgum, Knut .
JOURNAL OF SEPARATION SCIENCE, 2006, 29 (12) :1784-1821
[7]  
Hostettmann K., 1986, PREPARATIVE CHROMATO, P50
[8]   EFFECT OF THE SAMPLE SOLVENT ON BAND PROFILES IN PREPARATIVE LIQUID-CHROMATOGRAPHY USING NONAQUEOUS REVERSED-PHASE HIGH-PERFORMANCE LIQUID-CHROMATOGRAPHY [J].
JANDERA, P ;
GUIOCHON, G .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY, 1991, 588 (1-2) :1-14
[9]   Stationary and mobile phases in hydrophilic interaction chromatography: a review [J].
Jandera, Pavel .
ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2011, 692 (1-2) :1-25
[10]   Practical investigation of the factors that affect the selectivity in hydrophilic interaction chromatography [J].
Kumar, Abhinav ;
Heaton, James C. ;
McCalley, David V. .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2013, 1276 :33-46