Shared Decision-Making Measures: A Systematic Review

被引:19
|
作者
Ahmad, Muayyad [1 ]
Abu Tabar, Nazih [1 ]
Othman, Elham H. [2 ]
Abdelrahim, Zakaria [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Jordan, Sch Nursing, Queen Rania St, Amman 11942, Jordan
[2] King Hussein Canc Ctr, Amman, Jordan
[3] Jordan Univ Hosp, Amman, Jordan
关键词
COSMIN systematic review; health care; psychometric properties; shared decision-making measures; OPTION SCALE; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY; CARE; QUESTIONNAIRE; VALIDATION; COMMUNICATION; SUPPORT; TOOL;
D O I
10.1097/QMH.0000000000000250
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Objectives: This review used the recent COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) rating system, which gives the reader the ability to find appropriate instruments in a simple way. Shared decision-making (SDM) is part of health professionals', nurses', and patients' interaction about fundamental and special nursing care issues. The objective of this study was to critically appraise instruments that measure SDM in health care-related decisions according to the COSMIN criteria. Methods: This review was reported in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) guideline. A thorough search identified SMD measures via PubMed, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EBSCO Host, Ovid journals, SAGE journals, and Google Scholar search engine through November 2018 and updated on March 24, 2019. A rating system with "very good," "adequate," "doubtful," or "inadequate" for COSMIN was used. Results: The 17 instruments reported in this review are varied in the measured perspectives; observer-based viewpoint, patient questionnaires, provider questionnaires, and physician questionnaires, or even mixed perspectives. Only one instrument (OPTION 12 Scale) received an excellent rating across all 5 COSMIN validity rating sections in content, structural, and criterion validity. Conclusion: Most of the instruments scored poorly on the COSMIN checklist. Despite the vast number of instruments measuring SDM, researchers must undertake critical appraisal before selecting an acceptable instrument that meets the specific research goal, as well as the quality requirements.
引用
收藏
页码:54 / 66
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Systematic review of shared decision-making in surgery
    de Mik, S. M. L.
    Stubenrouch, F. E.
    Balm, R.
    Ubbink, D. T.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 105 (13) : 1721 - 1730
  • [2] Decision aids for promoting shared decision-making: A review of systematic reviews
    Park, Myonghwa
    Doan, Thao Thi-Thu
    Jung, Jihye
    Giap, Thi-Thanh-Tinh
    Kim, Jinju
    NURSING & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2024, 26 (01)
  • [3] Barriers and facilitators of pediatric shared decision-making: a systematic review
    Boland, Laura
    Graham, Ian D.
    Legare, France
    Lewis, Krystina
    Jull, Janet
    Shephard, Allyson
    Lawson, Margaret L.
    Davis, Alexandra
    Yameogo, Audrey
    Stacey, Dawn
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2019, 14 (1)
  • [4] Shared Decision-Making: a Systematic Review Focusing on Mood Disorders
    Ludovic Samalin
    Jean-Baptiste Genty
    Laurent Boyer
    Jorge Lopez-Castroman
    Mocrane Abbar
    Pierre-Michel Llorca
    Current Psychiatry Reports, 2018, 20
  • [5] Barriers and facilitators of pediatric shared decision-making: a systematic review
    Laura Boland
    Ian D. Graham
    France Légaré
    Krystina Lewis
    Janet Jull
    Allyson Shephard
    Margaret L. Lawson
    Alexandra Davis
    Audrey Yameogo
    Dawn Stacey
    Implementation Science, 14
  • [6] Shared Decision-Making: a Systematic Review Focusing on Mood Disorders
    Samalin, Ludovic
    Genty, Jean-Baptiste
    Boyer, Laurent
    Lopez-Castroman, Jorge
    Abbar, Mocrane
    Llorca, Pierre-Michel
    CURRENT PSYCHIATRY REPORTS, 2018, 20 (04)
  • [7] Do Shared Decision-Making Measures Reflect Key Elements of Shared Decision Making? A Content Review of Coding Schemes
    Kunneman, Marleen
    Henselmans, Inge
    Gartner, Fania R.
    Bomhof-Roordink, Hanna
    Pieterse, Arwen H.
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2019, 39 (07) : 886 - 893
  • [8] Decision Aids for Shared Decision-making in Uro-oncology: A Systematic Review
    Gruene, Britta
    Kriegmair, Maximilian C.
    Lenhart, Maximilian
    Michel, Maurice S.
    Huber, Johannes
    Koether, Anja K.
    Buedenbender, Bjorn
    Alpers, Georg W.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2022, 8 (03): : 851 - 869
  • [9] Barriers and facilitators to shared decision-making in oncology: a systematic review of the literature
    Jordan R. Covvey
    Khalid M. Kamal
    Erin E. Gorse
    Zumi Mehta
    Trupti Dhumal
    Elham Heidari
    Deepika Rao
    Christopher Zacker
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2019, 27 : 1613 - 1637
  • [10] Barriers and facilitators to shared decision-making in oncology: a systematic review of the literature
    Covvey, Jordan R.
    Kamal, Khalid M.
    Gorse, Erin E.
    Mehta, Zumi
    Dhumal, Trupti
    Heidari, Elham
    Rao, Deepika
    Zacker, Christopher
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2019, 27 (05) : 1613 - 1637