Extraprostatic Extension Is Extremely Rare for Contemporary Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer

被引:27
|
作者
Anderson, Blake B. [1 ]
Oberlin, Daniel T. [2 ]
Razmaria, Aria A. [1 ]
Choy, Bonnie [3 ]
Zagaja, Gregory P. [1 ]
Shalhav, Arieh L. [1 ]
Meeks, Joshua J. [2 ]
Yang, Ximing J. [4 ]
Paner, Gladell P. [1 ,3 ]
Eggener, Scott E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Urol Sect, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Urol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[3] Univ Chicago, Dept Pathol, 5841 S Maryland Ave, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[4] Northwestern Univ, Dept Pathol, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
关键词
Male; Neoplasm grading; Prostatectomy; Prostatic neoplasms; Seminal vesicles; ISUP CONSENSUS CONFERENCE; ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE COHORT; 2014 INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; GRADING SYSTEM; PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE; LYMPH-NODES; FOLLOW-UP; CARCINOMA; SPECIMENS;
D O I
10.1016/j.eururo.2016.11.028
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: A significant proportion of men with Gleason score 6 (GS6) prostate cancer undergo treatment with radiation or surgery. Objective: To assess pathologic stage of pure GS6 at radical prostatectomy (RP). Design, setting, and participants: In the period 2003-2014, 7817 patients underwent RP at two institutions. Of 2502 patients with GS6 at surgery, 60 were identified as stage pT3a-b on initial pathologic review, 55 with pT3a (extraprostatic extension, EPE), and five with pT3b (seminal vesicle invasion; SVI). All cases of GS6 with pT3 disease underwent contemporary pathologic evaluation for Gleason grade, stage, and extent of EPE. At one institution, all GS >= 7 pT3b cases were re-reviewed for downgrading. The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Gleason grading criteria and 2009 ISUP recommendations on pT3 staging were applied. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Calculated incidence (%) of pT3a, pT3b, pT4, and lymph node-positive disease. Results and limitations: Of the 60 GS6 pT3a-b cases identified in the period 2003-2014, seven (0.28% of entire GS6 cohort) with GS6 and pT3a were identified after re-review, all focal EPE. Among the re-examined cohort, no cases of GS6 with pT3b were observed. None of the 132 GS >= 7 pT3b cases were downgraded to GS6. Limitations include partial embedding of specimens and separate pathologic review at each institution. Conclusions: In a large prostatectomy cohort, GS6 never had seminal vesicle invasion (0%) and was very rarely (0.28%) associated with extraprostatic extension. Patient summary: GS6 prostate cancer rarely spreads outside the prostate. A new finding in this study was that GS6 prostate cancer never spread to the seminal vesicles. (C) 2016 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:455 / 460
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prediction of extraprostatic extension by prostate specific antigen velocity, endorectal MRI, and biopsy Gleason score in clinically localized prostate cancer
    Nishimoto, Koshiro
    Nakashima, Jun
    Hashiguchi, Akinori
    Kikuchi, Eiji
    Miyajima, Akira
    Nakagawa, Ken
    Ohigashi, Takashi
    Oya, Mototsugu
    Murai, Masaru
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 15 (06) : 520 - 523
  • [2] Incidence of Extraprostatic Extension at Radical Prostatectomy with Pure Gleason Score 3+3=6 (Grade Group 1) Cancer: Implications for Whether Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer Should be Renamed "Not Cancer" and for Selection Criteria for Active Surveillance
    Hassan, Oudai
    Han, Misop
    Zhou, Amy
    Paulk, Adina
    Sun, Yue
    Al-Harbi, Abdullah
    Alrajjal, Ahmed
    dos Santos, Filipa Baptista
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (06): : 1483 - 1487
  • [3] Prediction of Extraprostatic Extension in Men With Biopsy Gleason Score of 8 or Greater
    Nakanishi, Hiroyuki
    Troncoso, Patricia
    Babaian, R. Joseph
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 180 (06): : 2441 - 2445
  • [4] Incidence of Extraprostatic Extension at Radical Prostatectomy with Pure Gleason Score 3+3=6 (Grade Group 1) Cancer: Implications for Whether Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer Should be Renamed "Not Cancer" and for Selection Criteria for Active Surveillance EDITORIAL COMMENT
    Montironi, Rodolfo
    Scarpelli, Marina
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (06): : 1487 - 1488
  • [5] Prediction of Extraprostatic Extension in Men With Biopsy Gleason Score of 8 or Greater COMMENTS
    Sun, Leon
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 180 (06): : 2445 - 2445
  • [6] Prediction of extraprostatic cancer by prostate specific antigen density, endorectal MRI, and biopsy gleason score in clinically localized prostate cancer
    Horiguchi, A
    Nakashima, J
    Horiguchi, Y
    Nakagawa, K
    Oya, M
    Ohigashi, T
    Marumo, K
    Murai, M
    PROSTATE, 2003, 56 (01): : 23 - 29
  • [7] A Contemporary Prostate Cancer Grading System: A Validated Alternative to the Gleason Score
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    Zelefsky, Michael J.
    Sjoberg, Daniel D.
    Nelson, Joel B.
    Egevad, Lars
    Magi-Galluzzi, Cristina
    Vickers, Andrew J.
    Parwani, Anil V.
    Reuter, Victor E.
    Fine, Samson W.
    Eastham, James A.
    Wiklund, Peter
    Han, Misop
    Reddy, Chandana A.
    Ciezki, Jay P.
    Nyberg, Tommy
    Klein, Eric A.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (03) : 428 - 435
  • [8] Extraprostatic extension in prostate cancer: primer for radiologists
    Alice C. Shieh
    Ezgi Guler
    Vijayanadh Ojili
    Raj Mohan Paspulati
    Robin Elliott
    Nikhil H. Ramaiya
    Sree Harsha Tirumani
    Abdominal Radiology, 2020, 45 : 4040 - 4051
  • [9] Prognostic Significance of Extraprostatic Extension of Prostate Cancer
    Danneman, D.
    Wiklund, F.
    Wiklund, P.
    Egevad, L.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2012, 92 : 199A - 199A
  • [10] Should Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer Be Renamed as "Not Cancer"? Incidence of Extra-Prostatic Extension at Radical Prostatectomy (RP) with Pure Gleason Score 3+3=6 Cancer
    Hassan, Oudai
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2017, 30 : 229A - 230A